Is trading that hard? Or are people that stupid?

Quote from Pita:

you are playing with yourself and not against anything. When in you ARE the market and if you are nice enough to yourself you can kiss yourself to the place where you deserve to be.
Sweet
 
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

yawn ... get on topic or call it a day.



Like i said before trading is not that hard if you follow the rules. Now go play in your sand box. BTW you like cold cuts?
 
Quote from CaptnDustball:

1) I don't know for sure. But reading around and listening to how many hours others have put into this (days/years are kind of misleading because who knows how many hours a day that was), this is a fairly reasonable guess as to the miniumum requirement before light trading If I'm wrong, there's plenty of time (2 years) for me to figure it out and adjust.

2) I know my strengths. And one of them is that when I take something seriously, I dedicate myself 100%. But yes, you're right, it will still be hard.

3) I think the answer is already in the question. If my heart isn't in it, somewhere along the way I'll stop. Then I'll know I didn't want it bad enough. And because I wasn't dumb enough to risk my money during this period, I will have only wasted time.

At the very least, I'll have a better sense of how to invest my money, which will serve me well in the long run.

I don't think it will take that much time. Multiple years definitely seems excessive, I've been participating in the market for about 6 months, of which 2-3 months could be described as active trading, and now it seems like I'm at the break-even point. If you know you want to trade intraday, and you've already discovered the resources on ET and elsewhere, you're about where I was 3 months ago. 6 months ago I was at zero, I thought I was hot shit because I bought into a bunch of funds during the August dip (entirely by chance) and my account went up 10% in a month... gave it all back of course before I'd liquidated everything. It hasn't been all that long but I've personally come a very long way. I'm optimistic that the next few months weeks/months will net some good results for me, hopefully so I can certify myself as profitable.

I also think that there's not much value in paper trading, getting used to the emotions of having money on the line is the biggest step, and you can't get that by paper trading. Likewise, 'book learning' is most useful when you can put what you've read into practice the next day and see how it works out: learn by doing. If I'd spent 6-12 months just reading most of it would, frankly, have been wasted time. The best learning resources are also to be found on the internet imo because you can learn from the experiences of actual traders working with current instruments and market conditions. I bought a number of books but mostly didn't read them, they contain too much irrelevant and abstract information, too much theory. "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator" is the one book I am reading: it's entertaining, but it also contains a few nuggets of good advice.

You can always just trade very small lots, keeping your risk negligible unless you have a tiny account. It's only in the past couple of weeks that I'm finally sticking to the position size limits I set for myself, and in the past I took a number of steep losses due to exceeding these limits, but even so my "education" has only cost me about 5% of my starting capital over three months.
 
It seems like if you're smart, do a ton of research studying (for 1 or 2 years), play conservatively, don't get greedy, stick by your plan, etc., that it's not very hard to be good at this game. What do you think?

You dont mention being correctly capitalised.

By playing conservatively i assume you mean aiming for something like 25% a year in returns.

How much capital do you have?

You need to start out with 200K to make 50K a year, and then after paying your living expenses and taxes you wont have much left over to grow your account. So more like 400K is what you need if you want to trade conservatively.

Do you have 400K in trading capital?

Even if you think you can make 50% without much risk, then you really need to be starting with atleast 200K of capital.

The majority of the 'stupid' start with less than 50K and stand little chance of making a living, let alone growing the account at the same time. Are you one of them?
 
Quote from Anekdoten:

Successful trading is very similar to the end of the movie "The Matrix".

When Neo finally realizes he is "The One" he can see through the Matrix and a whole new door of opportunities opens up for him.

Very similar in trading, when you "get it" you will get a similar feeling and it will be so clear you won't doubt this the way you did before you "got it"

Anek

Wow... transcendental ecstasy gambling complex.

If you are the one, can you send me some cash since it seems like you have unlimited funds coming your way?

:)
 
The problem with trading is that there's no one to teach MOST of

us. There's no "Trading 101" class at the local college, so most of

us that want to learn this art, have to teach ourselves. Unlike

other students who become great, have mentors and teachers.

Back to the Matrix example. Neo wouldnt be sh-t without

morpheous
 
I've got a great idea...why don't you show all of us just how easy trading is. Post your live results on the list for everyone to see. Then you will know for sure if it is easy, or just a misunderstanding you have based on your absolute ignorance of what it is like to actually do it, instead of talk about it.

Quote from CaptnDustball:

I just started posting on ET and have never traded in my life. I've only recently started studying how to trade. A lot of people on this board talk about how hard trading is. But as I look around at some of these threads, many of these traders seem like morons. They did no homework when it comes to trading, jump in the waters too early, bet way too much of their capital on single buys, don't seem to know even the most basic of practices/rules. And a lot of them seem to come from gambling backgrounds - which pretty much assures that they'll self-destruct.

It seems like if you're smart, do a ton of research studying (for 1 or 2 years), play conservatively, don't get greedy, stick by your plan, etc., that it's not very hard to be good at this game. What do you think?

Also, how big of a percentage are these people in the trading world? I've been told that in order to succeed you need to be better than 95% of the traders out there. But if these people constitute 50% of all traders, then I only have to be better than 45%.
 
Quote from Specterx:

I don't think it will take that much time. Multiple years definitely seems excessive, I've been participating in the market for about 6 months, of which 2-3 months could be described as active trading, and now it seems like I'm at the break-even point. If you know you want to trade intraday, and you've already discovered the resources on ET and elsewhere, you're about where I was 3 months ago. 6 months ago I was at zero, I thought I was hot shit because I bought into a bunch of funds during the August dip (entirely by chance) and my account went up 10% in a month... gave it all back of course before I'd liquidated everything. It hasn't been all that long but I've personally come a very long way. I'm optimistic that the next few months weeks/months will net some good results for me, hopefully so I can certify myself as profitable.

I also think that there's not much value in paper trading, getting used to the emotions of having money on the line is the biggest step, and you can't get that by paper trading. Likewise, 'book learning' is most useful when you can put what you've read into practice the next day and see how it works out: learn by doing. If I'd spent 6-12 months just reading most of it would, frankly, have been wasted time. The best learning resources are also to be found on the internet imo because you can learn from the experiences of actual traders working with current instruments and market conditions. I bought a number of books but mostly didn't read them, they contain too much irrelevant and abstract information, too much theory. "Reminiscences of a Stock Operator" is the one book I am reading: it's entertaining, but it also contains a few nuggets of good advice.

You can always just trade very small lots, keeping your risk negligible unless you have a tiny account. It's only in the past couple of weeks that I'm finally sticking to the position size limits I set for myself, and in the past I took a number of steep losses due to exceeding these limits, but even so my "education" has only cost me about 5% of my starting capital over three months.
You are incredibly naive :eek: :eek: :eek:
 
Back
Top