--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from xiaodre:
Guessing is not a great choice when you try to describe trading. A trade does not consist of an entry only. Are you guessing if and when you enter, guessing again if you move your stop to breakeven, and guessing again if you don't increase your target and let the trade hit your target (ie. you don't do anything)?
Entry, trade management, money management: are these guesses that put together equal one bigger guess, or a series of guesses?
The point is all of this is superfluous; it doesn't matter. What really happens is that you have a theory that you use to trade your market. And the market is a complex system whose moving parts you cannot calculate completely. Most of scientific thought is guesswork. It doesn't matter.
If you break trading down to it's prerequiste parts, then you have a few aspects of trading that are in your control, and many aspects that are out of your control.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you have posted the process for obtaining the solution.
reading the sentences at the bottom is very close to the solution.
By having all the parts in hand all you have to do is the proper assembly using Science as you recommend. The parts only fall into one category: fully defined parts.
The solution is without flaws, anomalies or any missing parts.
As a consequence, as you say, you can plan on a perfect relationship between the entry and its exit.
This is also an unfolding process.
Some of the posts here have very high conviction. But they still do not express reality.
Somewhere in the series of posts there is a statement that this topic has been addressed before.
A nice topic is "Putting the Pieces Together". A system of how the market works, results. Trading to take the full offer is a lot of fun.
Quote from xiaodre:
Guessing is not a great choice when you try to describe trading. A trade does not consist of an entry only. Are you guessing if and when you enter, guessing again if you move your stop to breakeven, and guessing again if you don't increase your target and let the trade hit your target (ie. you don't do anything)?
Entry, trade management, money management: are these guesses that put together equal one bigger guess, or a series of guesses?
The point is all of this is superfluous; it doesn't matter. What really happens is that you have a theory that you use to trade your market. And the market is a complex system whose moving parts you cannot calculate completely. Most of scientific thought is guesswork. It doesn't matter.
If you break trading down to it's prerequiste parts, then you have a few aspects of trading that are in your control, and many aspects that are out of your control.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you have posted the process for obtaining the solution.
reading the sentences at the bottom is very close to the solution.
By having all the parts in hand all you have to do is the proper assembly using Science as you recommend. The parts only fall into one category: fully defined parts.
The solution is without flaws, anomalies or any missing parts.
As a consequence, as you say, you can plan on a perfect relationship between the entry and its exit.
This is also an unfolding process.
Some of the posts here have very high conviction. But they still do not express reality.
Somewhere in the series of posts there is a statement that this topic has been addressed before.
A nice topic is "Putting the Pieces Together". A system of how the market works, results. Trading to take the full offer is a lot of fun.
