I can say there is a lot of truth in the initial thesis of Cityboy. I didn't read the whole thread but from the first few pages, I see how many believers in trading success are here and not only here but in general in the world, but the point is not does the trading can provide profit but more like is it sustainable in the big universal scheme of life. How many successful traders we know that became multi-millionaires by trading only their own money and not been hedge fund managers or prop-shop owners or brokers. I know only 2-3 examples in the whole world and they are very modest millionaires. On the other hand, I know hundreds of brokers who are multimillionaires. It all depends on which side of the trade you are - a seller or a buyer of dreams!
Don't get me wrong, I was and still am kind of believer you can make some good percentage return if you are a highly skilled trader, but only way this can bring you money home is when you have really big initial capital and you trade very conservatively, otherwise chances of blowing everything is close to 100% in the long run.
If your goal in life is to prove you can be great trader like some people try proving they can be great athletes, great mountain climbers and you are not interested in the monetary outcome for you and your family than do it! If you are not interested in getting rich, but just to prove you can make money from trading than go for it with all your heart and mind! On the other hand if you want to make the money in the bank than there are better options for you, even in the financial industry like selling your knowledge and information, becoming a great salesperson for broker, bank or hedge fund, even manage other people's money (legally) all these options are with unlimited upside and almost zero downsides, compared to taking positions or especially highly leveraged positions in the market.
We have to admit there is a random element in the price fluctuations and this random element is much much greater than we all want to say. We all tend to search for patterns, waves, fundamental drivers, but in reality, nobody can predict with certainty or even with 80% chance what will happen next minute, hour or year.
We saw many examples but let me give you one more, check the Black Swan book of Nasim Taleb or his next books, all he is telling is exactly the same. People who become rich are those who take the opportunities with the biggest upside potential, while at the same time the smallest downside. There are few exceptions of course when people succeed with highly risky endeavors but you can't repeat this over and over again too much. If you are solo climber and you didn't stop on time than you will die sooner or later, same with hedge funds and proprietary traders, if they don't have another source of income than fail is inevitable, much better to bet on a long term trend and invest in dividend producing stocks for example than betting on the price of oil in half a year.
Thank you kindly. I agree with a lot of what you say. Sales, you could argue is the ultimate arbitrage (which is why I got good at it).
I think a lot depends on your motivation. If I can quote Mark Cuban , a lot of people are 'wantraprenuers' when starting their business. They 'want', the cars, the house, the social status etc...but they lack the accounting skills, business skills, the work ethic and sheer boring hard work and grind to achieve. They want the dopamine, the fantasy and the 'sugar for the brain.' The want to tell everyone they are a 'founder' or 'CEO' of a funky start-up that...due to the above...soon gets crushed by the market into oblivion.
In the world of trading I think a lot of people are captivated by the image, the films, the status, the delusion,the new self-identity of trading. Looking at multiple screens, talking (often in jargon) about the (ever-moving) markets and describing themselves as an important 'trader/family office portfolio manager etc' are more important to them than the only number that matters ...their performance (objectively measured by money in the bank and risk-adjusted P&L). For want of a better word they are 'wannabe-traders'.
If you take a totally dispassionate view (just like running your own business..or ...ironically, use a trader's mindset) you will find many 'trades' out there that make more sense. Here is an example...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ew-pitch-for-blue-collar-workers?srnd=premium
Now I would like to add an exception to the above. And this is an exception for only that fraction of one percentage I think that can succeed in trading. If somebody has the sheer:
1. Talent, passion and potential (high IQ)
2. Superhuman work ethic i.e. 100 hour plus work weeks, sleep in the office etc.
3. The ability to study advanced programming skills and higher level mathematics. The ability to complete elite credentials and degrees.
4. The ability to create the infrastructure of an asset management company - infrastructure, compliance, licensing, operational aspects, marketing etc
5. The ability to assemble (lead and inspire) a team
6. The ability to sell 1-5 above externally...to take rejection like a man, and pitch to 1000s of investors and actually close new funding.
Then maybe, just maybe...the person has a chance...and here I say a tiny chance ... no more of making it big.
If you are not willing to pay that kind of price, you should go back home and stare at your screens and read some book about somebody else who was willing and was rewarded for it. In other words, you will live vicariously through other people. Using an analogy, you will be wearing the shirt of your football hero as you scream his name during a match ...while he scores the touchdown, has sex with a beautiful woman and has all the glory... you could have had if you worked harder.
I would also argue that, as per the title of my post, the idea for 1-5 above wouldn't be to be dumb enough to look for alpha on some sort of systematic long/short equity or stat arb strategy (because this is a crowded trade) but rather something different. Look for another 'game' within the 'game.'