Is trading Gambling or not .."What say You" Vote here.

Is Trading Gambling or not

  • Gambling

    Votes: 460 35.0%
  • Not Gambling

    Votes: 854 65.0%

  • Total voters
    1,314
  • This poll will close: .
Quote from MrsSavant:

Why do some Gamblers qualify for bail-outs?

Could Gambling be based on the "who you know" factor?
Could having the "edge" in trading be the same thing as "who you know"?

Wifey

WTF this is disturbing, it's already been shown in the past you are actually one of Electric Savant's sock puppets.

Sorry but that's just disturbing.
 
Quote from MrsSavant:

Why do some Gamblers qualify for bail-outs?....


Well then, if you qualify for bail-outs, that's not gambling.

Risk-free gambling, gimme a few billion of that.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/03/AR2009010300040.html

"Peterson pointed to a famous study in Taiwan showing that gamblers chose a strategy paying them repeated small amounts even if at some point they had to take a huge loss. In more than 200 trials, the gamblers were given different decks to select cards from. In one deck, on average four of the five cards produced small gains, while the fifth card wiped out the wins and led them down a money losing path. The other decks of cards produced, on average, four small losses and one big win, which netted out to overall gains. The researchers were stunned when, given a choice, gamblers continued to want to pull cards from the small-gain deck. "

"We like these consistent gains," Peterson said. "You can't underestimate their power."
 
Just take a look at what happened to poor electricsavant. First it was the fake trading, then it was the phoney wife, then he vanished forever.

don't let this happen to you, kids.


Sandy
 
Trading is gambling.

It is a perverse form of gambling, gambling on life, or some demented version of life in which the bets are on how much the corporations (non-humans) can take off of the humans(consumers) this quarter, or .

It can be strictly managed gambling or reckless gambling.
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

so when you "add to"..."average down"....or "pyramid"...is this "not gambling" because it is a more current condition-based risk?

does the "market" distingish between your condition...your leverage....your entries....your geometric progression....or does it trade independently from you...assuming your size is average....

when you double down or split in blackjack...do you increase your probability...

when you increase betsize at roulette after each loss...do you buy time?

When you cross the street and only look one way is there a 50% risk that you will get hit?

Any idea why are you projecting your own shortcomings and seeking validation to your beliefs that trading is gambling?

Cheers,
Max
 
Quote from ElectricSavant:

Is it Gambling

Or Not
=============
No;
but some use the word ''gambling'' simply to mean excessive risk,
not a real wise idea[ excesssive risk].

Even though the youngest, they are the more likely to sneer @the idea of any danger in risk. But there is a reason why many teens pay a [risk premium on thier auto insurance/die young:cool:] Wisdom is profitable to direct.
 
He Lives !

I will hang up the phone and let you respond.

ElectricSavant Out

Quote from sandeater:

Just take a look at what happened to poor electricsavant. First it was the fake trading, then it was the phoney wife, then he vanished forever.

don't let this happen to you, kids.


Sandy
 
Well Said...but could this be calculated?

ES

Quote from cgtrader:

Trading is gambling.

It is a perverse form of gambling, gambling on life, or some demented version of life in which the bets are on how much the corporations (non-humans) can take off of the humans(consumers) this quarter, or .

It can be strictly managed gambling or reckless gambling.
 
Back
Top