Quote from marketdancer:
illiquid - lol....each market participant like those institutional traders just "implement" their edge on the market..each participant do it in his own way...morality,ethics,right or wrong aside in another topic....they are simply employing their "edge" .....
I know underneath it's all a semantics game, but I wasn't referring to ethics or morality at all -- I'm comparing the market maker or specialist who is just managing merchandise and not really making any judgement on the market whatsoever, versus someone who's not required to take the risk at all but chooses to.
In essence, someone who's got the temerity to claim that at this moment, the market is in one way or another wrong, and therefore an opportunity for profit available. Is there a real qualitative difference between those two?
illiquid - yes.....that specialist got his "system" in extracting money from this market....like don bright has his own way...
so many ways...even the market vendors has "found" their way how to make money from the markets...
ok..back to real trader only essentials.....yes....definitely..to be one and live long enough doing it....DEFINITELY you have to have SOME EDGE....otherwise..just become "another liquidity provider"
Seriously...Of Course there should be..there IS!!!!
the wizards are not some fluke of statistics..these folkes really got some edge.....
may point being that they DO EXIST!!!
those who has given up or fail to find what works for them got their own beliefs and conclusions too....