He's basically trading with a 1:1 return on risk (sometimes lower than 1), trading a standard size, but even though the size is constant the stop losses and take profit levels vary. So one trade he might take a 30 point hit, and other 60, so he'll lose $3k one trade and $6k another.
His stops are wide as hell and seems to be selling into support or buying resistance, with a wide stop above the previous swing high or below the previous swing low. Price tends to retrace deeply towards his stop immediately after entry.
Seems like basic "Support breaks, sell it, resistance breaks, buy it" with wide stops and then just hoping for runners.
I read through more of his Telegram. He basically says: "Entries are static, profits/exits are not. Use your own best judgment" but then proceeds to not explain what that judgment is or how to use it to profitably exit the trade. Sounds like the same vague advice everyone gives in books/courses/videos that no one ever explains how to do with precision.
A lot of his trades seem to go 0.5x in his favor and he considers it "profitable", but unless he is hitting getting out to the tick on a reversal he isn't coming away with much.
I'm pretty much calling bullshit on it, and to me at least, this is a closed case. Thanks to everyone who responded and provided insight. Despite what other cheerleaders say about this guy (not you guys but others have mentioned him) I'm going to ignore him.
It's always a balance between probability, risk, and reward. He scalps so what's bullshit about large risk with small reward but higher probability? There are people that explain/write about how to trade like that, but studying it seems to involve doing more work than what most active posters on ET feel like doing.
