Quote from Businessman:
The trick is to reduce the number of contracts/shares you trade
when the markets are volatile.
Actually it depends upon the strategy.
For example, if your using a non-volatility method...
Yes, you should reduce the position size to better manage the risk exposure when markets have high volatility.
However, if your using a volatility based strategy (I do)...
You should trade your normal position size during volatile price action and reduce the position size to better manage the risk exposure when markets have low volatility.
My point is that if a trader gets to the point that they can recognize if the price action has high volatility, low volatility or normal volatility
as it is occurring...
Position size management should be at the top of the list of priorities.
Further, you should know
statistically which type of volatility conditions your methodology performs the best or worst to
confirm the difference in position size management that results from volatility analysis.
Also, keep in mind that the word
worst doesn't imply losses because it just may imply low profits or more difficult trading to get profits.
Last of all, volatility analysis is the preferred choice in comparison to volume analysis even though they have some similarities in the analysis.
However, if a trader wants to resolve some of the weakness associated with Volume Analysis or trading instruments that don't have volume or the volume is not providing useful info...
Volatility Analysis is the path to take.
Mark