80..90..95% failure rate.
The numbers don't make sense if you believe that there are only two results for a trade - win or lose and therefore profit or loss.
A monkey tapping orders from a keyboard should have a better chance of success even accounting for commission and slippage.
My explanation;
The high loss rate is primarily due to poor money management.
Trader A has a relatively high batting average (in terms of win/loss ratio) but hasn't learnt to capitalize on his winners
Trader B has a lower than average batting average and is unfamiliar with the concept of capitalizing on his winners.
Trader C also has a lower than average batting average (perhaps less than 30% W/L ratio) but has learnt to push his winners.
Who wins?
Trader B is soon out of the game. He might return but unless he's modified his behavior then chances are that he suffers the same fate, repeatedly.
Trader A stays in the game and might even make a buck or two but he tends to fight the market and the end result is usually borderline at best.
Trader C is much more likely to be and to stay in the 5% class because he has learnt to do what the majority of traders have most difficulty with.
Conclusion. Its not so much about picking the winners but rather its about riding the winners.
JMO
The numbers don't make sense if you believe that there are only two results for a trade - win or lose and therefore profit or loss.
A monkey tapping orders from a keyboard should have a better chance of success even accounting for commission and slippage.
My explanation;
The high loss rate is primarily due to poor money management.
Trader A has a relatively high batting average (in terms of win/loss ratio) but hasn't learnt to capitalize on his winners
Trader B has a lower than average batting average and is unfamiliar with the concept of capitalizing on his winners.
Trader C also has a lower than average batting average (perhaps less than 30% W/L ratio) but has learnt to push his winners.
Who wins?
Trader B is soon out of the game. He might return but unless he's modified his behavior then chances are that he suffers the same fate, repeatedly.
Trader A stays in the game and might even make a buck or two but he tends to fight the market and the end result is usually borderline at best.
Trader C is much more likely to be and to stay in the 5% class because he has learnt to do what the majority of traders have most difficulty with.
Conclusion. Its not so much about picking the winners but rather its about riding the winners.
JMO