Quote from polpolik:
There are people that scalp for a living but it's too stressful for me to be trading that way - going for .5 to 1 ticks at a time.
I don't like scalping. Seriously. I want to buy at the beginning of a trend and ride it to the end and make a decent profit with 1 round trip and low commission. That's what I WANT to do.
But every time I ride a trend I either end up calling the top (or the bottom), or I get stopped out (right before the trend takes off), or I hold too long and then lose all my profits in one giant bar the opposite way.
My backtesting with trend following systems reveals that the only way to have net profitability (sometimes) is to ride every trend until the end. Fixed profit targets (tested with 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 15 ticks) result in net losses. For a trend following system to be effective you HAVE to capture the home run movements in order to have your winners outweigh your losers. You need that one +100 tick trade to balance out all the other bullshit trades. At least based on my backtesting.
That's why I decided to do the opposite of all that. If trend following while NOT holding on for big winners results in losses, the going counter-trend should result in winners.
Now, I guarantee you I'm going to try to make this mechanical and end up ruining it. I don't like "discretionary" because it's not consistent. "I took that trade because I felt like the market was going to keep going up" is not quantifiable and therefore bullshit. If you "felt" like the market was going to keep going up, you obviously based that on something (past experiences) and therefore used a rule set to arrive at your decision. So say and explain that.
I do not like and won't use systems that don't have 100% mechanical entry AND EXIT rules. I've spent as many hours as the next guy searching the net for the "holy grail" system and coding my own crazy custom indicators and 99.9% of bullshit out there has mechanical entry rules but no set exit rules. Of course, most of the time there was some winning sometime after the entry signal, but it's bullshit to look at a chart and assume that you would have had a winner just because you were in the green at some point after you entered. You have no way of knowing if it's going to go 1 tick in your favor or 100 ticks in your favor. So people compensate for this with trailing stop losses, but there are a bunch of papers out there about how stop losses actually impact your profitability over time unless you make them super wide, in which case you might as well not even use them at all.
Holy crap I'm ranting off subject here. My bad.
In the first sentence of this post I said I don't like scalping. The only thing that's cool about it is seeing all the little tiny wins add up to a big bottom line. It's the same concept as when I do trend following and I see all the little losses add up to one big loss.