Is THIS possible???
- Thread starter omegapoint
- Start date
Okay, none of them are trying to earn a living. Thats why, and I know this from an hr mgr., resumes and applications fill in trays to the hundreds with over qualifieds for every position floated. Try to be reasonable, not all of them are fat single mom welfare cases.
partyer par'ty¡¤er or par'ti¡¤er n.
http://www.answers.com/topic/party
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/partyer
Mirror, mirror.
See? YOU didn't need any help. In fact, it can be spelled both ways. And yet, you're the one who now looks stupid, and solely as a result of your own doing. You're self-made.
Quote from Lucrum:
Actually I was referring to your claim that they are not as pernicious. And no I realize not all of them are fat single mom welfare cases. I'd guess neither you, Gabby or Ricter are single moms.
Boths sides of the aisle purport to want people back to work but
with corporate outsourcing the work and even moving how can they be trusted after we give them breaks. The banks even turned around and passed out bailout money as bonuses. Corporate operates, as we've all heard, in a "you can't blame them for doing whats best for them" way. Knowing that, now we have to make the rules so that whats best for them isn't to
betray the good faith taxpayers bestow on them in the form of
breaks and subsidies, and if they move out, don't expect taxpayers/governent to give them contracts ..(Catepillar) and maybe even instead of always incentivizing them lets try disincentivizing for wrong.
Dear Numbnuts (please read "numb balls"),
My point was that "polluting the water" goes on from the left and the right. As I have said before...liberals like to think they are making "cute" little witticisms and remarks...and that justifies their ad hominem attacks. Wake up! The country burns as liberals call for more communism/socialism and neocons call for more wars and defense industry perks. WE ARE BROKE!
-gastropod
M
You are correct about the alternate spelling; however, there were two reasons why I said you looked stupid. Look at your original post and see if you can figure it out. As far as looking in the mirror, I don't think you want to go there. That would require you to reflect on your pathetic existence of almost sixty years.
You are correct about the alternate spelling; however, there were two reasons why I said you looked stupid. Look at your original post and see if you can figure it out. As far as looking in the mirror, I don't think you want to go there. That would require you to reflect on your pathetic existence of almost sixty years.
Let's say for the sake of arguement it's true, politics is a sewer and should be expected.
What annoys me is corporate/finance message boards such as Yahoo do the same thing. Go post a message you're going to go short on any pos stock and people will attempt to pound you into the ground.
What annoys me is corporate/finance message boards such as Yahoo do the same thing. Go post a message you're going to go short on any pos stock and people will attempt to pound you into the ground.
Well, if you look at the stuff out there first as "The New Goebbels" until proven otherwise, it may make filtering a bit easier. 