Is this HFT?

Quote from earlyexit:

To all of those having these problems. May I ask how you route your orders? And who do you trade through?



u cant beat HFT because u are a small trader.

Small! Small! s...m-all


<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lag73IP2CPY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Quote from earlyexit:

To all of those having these problems. May I ask how you route your orders? And who do you trade through?

sure..IB. from my experience routing directly to market center,where in example above bid was sitting wouldn't change anything. makes no difference if it's either "smart" or directed order.
 
Quote from bonds:

I was trying to sell 2000 shares of GFI... it was 13.32x13.33 and there was over 5000 shares on the bid at 13.32

I sold 2000 shares at 13.32 and the bid pulled and i get no fill at all and instantly the bid went to 13.30x13.31...

then i did the same tried to sell at 13.30 and again it pulled and i got none.

I got frustrated and sold 3 cents out of the money and got a horrible fill... all this apparent liquidity im seeing i cant sell my shares to.

Is this HFT? Are the bids im seeing pulling when they see my sell order come in? I dont even think they are real? Sure its fine when i put a bid or sell order to get out but when i have to buy or sell on the bid or offer... forget it! Ugh!!

if you post what platform, what route, and what route strategy you used to place the order you might get better answers. without that, hard to say what's going on.
 
Quote from Random.Capital:

That doesn't look like HFT, that looks like an aggressive internalizer. What firm are you at?

My thoughts exactly. It doesn't matter how fast the robot is. It can't remove it's bid after your crossed ask hits the ecn. That would be some serious foul play.
 
Quote from rolando87:

What I dont understand is how can the HFT firms see your order and then decide to cancel. By that point isnt it too late?How can an order to buy just sit around until the order to cancel comes in from the HFT computer? Doesnt the response time take longer (ie the speed of light).

Also isn't it in the exchange's best interest to not let that happen.

It's a LATENCY GAME fellas!

The Exchanges have offered the HFT firms the "right" to see order-flow given how much quicker their data-feeds are due to CO-LOCATION of their trading servers right on the floor of the Nasdaq data-centers in NJ.

The ability to CO-LOCATE is offered to ANYONE by the Exchange.
This is a big revenue stream for the Exchange.
Period. End of Story.

It's ALL about the ability to FRONT-RUN because you can CO-LOCATE on the floor of the EXCHANGE DATA-CENTER.

For the retail trader, it's as if you are sitting up in the stands watching a Horse Race. Given the data-feed latency that you experience with your trading platform, you are watching the horses round the final turn while the HFT crowd who have co-located their servers on the Exchange floor have already seen the winner just come thru the finish line.
 
Quote from Landis82:

It's a LATENCY GAME fellas!

The Exchanges have offered the HFT firms the "right" to see order-flow given how much quicker their data-feeds are due to CO-LOCATION of their trading servers right on the floor of the Nasdaq data-centers in NJ.

The ability to CO-LOCATE is offered to ANYONE by the Exchange.
This is a big revenue stream for the Exchange.
Period. End of Story.

It's ALL about the ability to FRONT-RUN because you can CO-LOCATE on the floor of the EXCHANGE DATA-CENTER.

For the retail trader, it's as if you are sitting up in the stands watching a Horse Race. Given the data-feed latency that you experience with your trading platform, you are watching the horses round the final turn while the HFT crowd who have co-located their servers on the Exchange floor have already seen the winner just come thru the finish line.

IMO Colocation and speed are a fine game as soon as it is based on trades, quotes or active book liquidity that already occured( like in the futures markets ). The problem here is not that retail are late to the game of the MMs , it is that the MMs see the incoming marketable orders before they are matched.
 
Quote from TraDaToR:

The problem here is not that retail are late to the game of the MMs , it is that the MMs see the incoming marketable orders before they are matched.

Are you sure of that? Is this your speculation or the speculation of places like zeroHedge? Is there an actual account of this?

As far as I'm aware. The only time someone sees orders before they are matched is when you are trading through a firm that internalizes (i.e. IB and just about every other retail outfit) and you use their smart orders.
 
Hello earlyexit,

I am not a stock trader, I don't know much so of course it can be an internalizer( in this case, it's just IB that screwed me ), I am not aware enough of how the stock markets work. I am just stating that on some low volume stocks( with 10 ticks + B/A spread ) , when you click on some bid or ask, you have a good chance it will disappear just because of your order.
 
Back
Top