In both cases, the outcomes involve risk and potential losses, which are not characteristics of arbitrage.
Arbitrage would require a guaranteed, risk-free profit, which is not the case here.
this has got to be one of the stupidest fucking questions I have ever seen relating to options. No it's not an arb! In scenario 1, you are out of the stock and lock in a loss. In scenario 2, you could end up losing a lot more if the stock tanks.
I don't fully get your example, but how possibly could you buy an ITM call for cheaper than the stock? A call is essentially a stock + put (ignoring interest, dividends, etc.), so your put is essentially negative if the ITM call + strike price is less than the current price.
So yes, definitely an arbitrage opportunity if the ITM strike + call is cheaper than the stock, but how could that possibly be?
Unrealized losses are not losses any more than unrealized gains are gains.
Lol it's a bit cryptic but sound. If you consider an unrealized loss a loss then that's the same as considering an unrealized gain a gain.