Quote from hypostomus:
Please excuse the intrusion, but I like to stalk Jack with a pooper scooper minority report. Sounds like a strategy, huh? Define "low". Define "picks up". Explain how you are confident volume was "green" based on the price bar alone. Define "tapering back". Of such definitions are testable (equals tradeable) systems made.
The stategy here is to allow people buy in by asking questions (an orientation introduced by the OP).
On the other hand telling me what to do is not a good idea. Refrain in the future since you are on notice.
Because you love dealing with your pooper scooper in the world you live in just means you have a particular orientation.
Do the work for a change.
Code this up by using a drag and drop (that can handle look up tables) from somewhere and then tweak it to optimize it and post the coded results including all of the measurements that qualify any trading strategy. BO trading is already coded up and some really expert people have it articulated to a fineness beyond compare. Now you get a change to lay it on the line as see if you can get it straight on this level.
We are starting with a one class of elements data set that determines an exit and an entry. Price is not involved except to set direction. Color is determined by some unknown (at present) relationship of two fixed values (by definition) of price. This is the degree of roughness present in this strategy based upon NOW and pool extraction.
We have to monitor volume for color (direction) and size (low (a single value that is GO/NOGO tested), rate of change positively and negatively). All of these are binary constructs. In terms of aural, visual, and kinesthetic considerations, the person is using a sheet of paper and doing mental arithematic to deal with a particular GO/NOGO measure.
I am a proponent of support, comfort and confidence in trading instead of the fear, anxiety and anger setting of the conventional orthodoxy which you and yours are surrounded by.