No, i'm very focused on the lessons i'm teaching. They puzzle together nicely. I'm talking about the effects of faith and how that bears upon the concept of evidence. Thanks for participating.
I was talking about the ability to look into the future, and was challenging studentofthemarkets's assertion that old Jewish prophecy is necessarily superior, or makes Christianity superior. There really only has been one basic prophecy in Christianity, that Christ would come again, which has not yet come true, according to common expectations. So he is relying on old Jewish prophecy, or what he calls prophecy (maybe it was poetry, or pop fiction), for the validity of Christianity, which has not yet delivered on it's prime expectation. When you start to examine his claims for the old closer, you will find square hole, into which he is trying to force round pegs.
I mention it here because this is where he decided to make his main claims (prophecy) for the veracity of Christianity, as put forth by legacy mainstream tradition.