In the infamous thread "Trading with stop losses in a futures market is for losers" a couple of things were brought up that I thought were interesting.
Now lets take the example of the average Joe with a 10k account trading 1 contract on the ES. He uses an ATM strategy of a 1 point loss.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but how could SIM be different than LIVE if the broker can't even see your stop loss?
I've seen price movements where it seems like MM were SL hunting, so I'm a bit skeptic of the subject. But I can see the position from both sides and juts trying to settle it once and for all.
Thoughts?
So you all say MM or whomever hunt down your stop losses. This would indicate that SIM is significantly different than trading live. Correct?
Quote from fullautotrading:
Yep, the microstructure would be different, as it is evident anytime you place an order (especially if large).
However, for most "meaningful" strategies, which take their due time to work and allow for other participant's action to take effect, and have smarter hedging schemes, SIM would still be ok.
(Clearly, if you are attempting to go after a few ticks, which is nonsense anyway, of course the SIM would be totally misleading, as it would give a "neutral" environment, while the "real" one is not. But for "larger" strategies it's ok)
Now lets take the example of the average Joe with a 10k account trading 1 contract on the ES. He uses an ATM strategy of a 1 point loss.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but how could SIM be different than LIVE if the broker can't even see your stop loss?
I've seen price movements where it seems like MM were SL hunting, so I'm a bit skeptic of the subject. But I can see the position from both sides and juts trying to settle it once and for all.
Thoughts?