Quote from RCG Trader:
You do not think the very base of this conflict is not ethnic and religious?
Spend the rest of the day reading down here, and make sure you follow any relevant links. Also, Google the concept of political dog whistling.
It's about political ideas. There are certainly correlated ethnic and religious attributes that tend to be found on partisans of both sides, but those are not the driving factors.
Besides, given that it is a tenet of Leftist ideology that Christian whites suppress those of other religions & ethnicities here in the US, it would seem to me that the opportunity to live in a completely separate sovereign nation away from all the white racists would be a welcome change. What am I missing here?
Given the rhetoric I hear non-stop from the Left about how irredeemably stupid and ignorant their political opponents are, I would think that the Left would jump at the chance to have its own country where it could do whatever it wanted without political opposition. Why end up settling for half-measures due to the presence of opposition when you can get the whole loaf? If you had your own country, you could have Paul Krugman as Secretary of the Treasury for all eternity, if you wanted. Or, heck, someone even further to the Left than Krugman.
Problem is, obviously, that those on the Left who would occupy positions of power in such a country don't want the accountability that would come with it.
Doesn't say much for your "leaders", does it?