Natural selection is a theory, not a recognized law of nature.
Is there an order in the Universe?
- Thread starter andrasnm
- Start date
"The PAH world hypothesis proposes that the use of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) was a means for a pre-RNA World basis for the origin of life. As yet it is untested." AS YET IT IS UNTESTED...wtf does this mean???
and there are many scientists that say the Miller-Urey experiment which is the one best argument for the origin of life being by chance was not accurate...2 of the leading origin of life scientist ( kluas Dose and Sidney Fox confirmed that miller used the wrong gas )....
much like the theory of gravity.
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512
Evangelical Scientist zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Refutes Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory
August 17, 2005 | Issue 41â¢33
KANSAS CITY, KSâAs the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held "theory of gravity" is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling."Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.
Burdett added: "Gravityâwhich is taught to our children as a lawâis founded on great gaps in understanding. The laws predict the mutual force between all bodies of mass, but they cannot explain that force. Isaac Newton himself said, 'I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.' Of course, he is alluding to a higher power."
(more)
Gravity is a consistent and predictable force. The force of gravity, which we call it, is known by measurement of the behavior of physical bodies. We measure the motion, and we can predict precisely because some force (gravity) is constant, measurable, quantifiable and predictable. We see clear mathematical formulas that relate to the force of gravity.
Evolutionary forces, if we can actually call them that (though I doubt it from a purely scientific foundation) are not consistent and predictable, they are haphazard and random, and in no way predictable nor measurable. We see no clear mathematical formulas that relate to the "force" of evolution.
Please don't even try to confuse hard science, i.e. physics, with speuclative theory of biology and Darwinism...
Your post is useless, and contributes only your resentments at 50 years of some religion, and your immature rebellion against it...
Evolutionary forces, if we can actually call them that (though I doubt it from a purely scientific foundation) are not consistent and predictable, they are haphazard and random, and in no way predictable nor measurable. We see no clear mathematical formulas that relate to the "force" of evolution.
Please don't even try to confuse hard science, i.e. physics, with speuclative theory of biology and Darwinism...
Your post is useless, and contributes only your resentments at 50 years of some religion, and your immature rebellion against it...
be that as it may the theory of natural selection is just as much a law as the theory of gravity.
"Be that as it may..."
Too funny.
Natural selection is not a law, is it a theoretical part of an overall dogmatic theory found and promoted in Darwinism.
Those who confuse Darwinism with hard science are soft in the head...
Too funny.
Natural selection is not a law, is it a theoretical part of an overall dogmatic theory found and promoted in Darwinism.
Those who confuse Darwinism with hard science are soft in the head...
i never said natural selection was a law. it is a theory just as the theory of gravity is a theory. science does not yet know what causes gravity. they only have theories about gravity.
Wrong.
There are specific laws of gravity dating back to Newton...and lots of laws that physicists use to do their work...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_laws_in_science
It is not necessary to know ultimate causation to qualify some specific principle in nature as a law of nature.
To in any way try to confuse people into thinking or believing that Darwinism, of which natural selection is an aspect, is on par with physics is the ultimate is intellectual dishonesty...
All you have to do is show me the mathematical formula for natural selection, which of course we both know you can't...
I suggest you read the following, and stop pretending to be some kind of scientist, since you can't even get simple concepts of law and theory into the soft part of your noggin....
http://wilstar.com/theories.htm
In addition, for a theory to stand the rigor and scientific testiing of say Einstein's theories, the theory must be accepted to be universally true on the basis of hard science and math, not dogmatic belief systems and speculation by atheists...
There are specific laws of gravity dating back to Newton...and lots of laws that physicists use to do their work...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_laws_in_science
It is not necessary to know ultimate causation to qualify some specific principle in nature as a law of nature.
To in any way try to confuse people into thinking or believing that Darwinism, of which natural selection is an aspect, is on par with physics is the ultimate is intellectual dishonesty...
All you have to do is show me the mathematical formula for natural selection, which of course we both know you can't...
I suggest you read the following, and stop pretending to be some kind of scientist, since you can't even get simple concepts of law and theory into the soft part of your noggin....
http://wilstar.com/theories.htm
In addition, for a theory to stand the rigor and scientific testiing of say Einstein's theories, the theory must be accepted to be universally true on the basis of hard science and math, not dogmatic belief systems and speculation by atheists...
Brother,
It's very much in your interest to begin perceiving ultimate causation. Otherwise, for example, you may think death is a "law of nature", and accept it. If you don't know the cause, you would not be able to abolish it.
This is to say that every seeming "law" can be unmade by its maker. When you understand that this universe is something the Son of God briefly considered and laughed off, then you will know that it is your mind behind the illusion. Then you can take -retake - control of the situation.
Jesus