Quote from Martinghoul:
Well, it's not about the rules. The plan, as it has been set out, generally authorizes the EFSF to do a lot of things (e.g. bank recapitalizations, etc) and that part of it is certainly positive. Moreover, the ECB has signaled that they're gonna play ball. So, like many things that have been done throughout this crisis by the Eurocrats, it looks OK on paper and in theory.
The big problem with the current plan is that it's puny in terms of size. It might be enough for Greece, Portugal and Ireland, which is why the idiots in Brussels are celebrating. However, they still don't get the simple fact that the problem has evolved and it's not about Greece, Ireland and Portugal any more. If you want to rescue the EU, you need a credible backstop for when Spain and Italy start to wobble (which is what we observed last week). EFSF, with its effective lending capacity of only â¬225bn, is nowhere near enough (Italy alone needs to re-finance arnd â¬250bn+ of debt per year, of which arnd 45% is held externally). I believe that's why, after the initial euphoria, Italy started to widen back out on Friday, as real money resumed selling.
So yes, you're right, Locutus, they'll probably keep changing the rules. However, have you noticed the ever escalating dynamic? The speed of contagion keeps increasing, while the effectiveness of official "solutions" doesn't. Moreover, it looks like the negotiations are becoming increasingly acrimonious, chaotic and difficult. All this increases the risk that one or several of the participants will conclude that the costs of holding on to the Euro are too high and that it's cheaper to walk away. Personally, I have been getting increasingly pessimistic (as you may have observed from my posts).