Quote from Mercor:
OK, if this was the case, let me also speculate.
He would have not even gone into Afghanistan.
He would be stuck with Clinton quagmire of containing Saddam.
which would have been in the 18th year.
Well it doesn't take much speculation when he supported Afghanistan.
As for Saddam, yes, the horrible, non-quagmire of Saddam would have been going on for its 18th year, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis would still be alive, four million refugees would still be living in their homes, and we would be one to three trillion dollars richer.
Had he been forced to go into Afghanistan we would be seeing 4000 causalites by now.
I can't see a world with us not going to war being better then the situation we have now
Really? You don't see lower debt and therefore a stronger dollar being better than we have now?