Daal wrote...
The change can be made through cutting taxes on investing and saving to decrease the consumption culture and encourage production, cut government spending on the entitlement programs to pay for those.
Any politician who tries to run on this base will be destroyed by the leftwing media and the democrats. I say learn chinese
.....................................................................................................
Excellent Commentary...
Yes taxes are an add on cost that certainly effects productivity...
This is why it is absolutely imperative for the US to establish a simple form of consumption tax....with no further type of taxes..
The simple reason is Globalization....This is one of the costs that have to come into line...and can further equilibrate the Chinese costs...
I would suggest another cost to be adjusted is legal largesse...
ie Paulson at this moment is asking for the relaxation of Sarbanes Oxley etc...
I would suggest that legal largesse be corrected first because this can be done with the stroke of a pen...and does not require 20 year changeover periods ie FORD plants etc....
Absolutely....correcting LEGAL LARGESSE and TAXES would go a long way towards making the US more competitive ....
Do you really think that the labor in China...and the land in China is that different ?....or can the advantages be related to items such as TAXES...LEGAL LARGESSE...etc.... Or does the US want to make sure that the tax picture and legal picture is the same in other countries ?
The change can be made through cutting taxes on investing and saving to decrease the consumption culture and encourage production, cut government spending on the entitlement programs to pay for those.
Any politician who tries to run on this base will be destroyed by the leftwing media and the democrats. I say learn chinese
.....................................................................................................
Excellent Commentary...
Yes taxes are an add on cost that certainly effects productivity...
This is why it is absolutely imperative for the US to establish a simple form of consumption tax....with no further type of taxes..
The simple reason is Globalization....This is one of the costs that have to come into line...and can further equilibrate the Chinese costs...
I would suggest another cost to be adjusted is legal largesse...
ie Paulson at this moment is asking for the relaxation of Sarbanes Oxley etc...
I would suggest that legal largesse be corrected first because this can be done with the stroke of a pen...and does not require 20 year changeover periods ie FORD plants etc....
Absolutely....correcting LEGAL LARGESSE and TAXES would go a long way towards making the US more competitive ....
Do you really think that the labor in China...and the land in China is that different ?....or can the advantages be related to items such as TAXES...LEGAL LARGESSE...etc.... Or does the US want to make sure that the tax picture and legal picture is the same in other countries ?
