Is the taxpayer footing the Giuliani bill?


@Here4money

Ah, so you'd be OK with spending billions of dollars to arrest someone with possession of cocaine.

That brings me back to the ROI question. Since you are OK spending essentially any amount for any criminal whatsoever to be brought to justice, ROI isn't something you care about.

Let's tuck this little fact away for future use, ok?
 
@Here4money

Ah, so you'd be OK with spending billions of dollars to arrest someone with possession of cocaine.

That brings me back to the ROI question. Since you are OK spending essentially any amount for any criminal whatsoever to be brought to justice, ROI isn't something you care about.

Let's tuck this little fact away for future use, ok?
nah, I'm done entertaining your derailing of the thread
 
nah, I'm done entertaining your derailing of the thread

It didn't have to derail at all if you would just say yes or no. This is a message forum, and the point is to ask questions and discuss things. Not my fault if you are unable or unwilling to do that unless the narrative fits you.

You could always put me back on ignore again. Was easier for you.
 
It didn't have to derail at all if you would just say yes or no. This is a message forum, and the point is to ask questions and discuss things. Not my fault if you are unable or unwilling to do that unless the narrative fits you.

You could always put me back on ignore again. Was easier for you.

not really, the point is to discuss the topic at hand, no entertain every segway posters wish to go on, otherwise we wouldn't have sub-sections and/or thread titles. This is quite a common standard in most internet forums w/the exception of ET. Vanz went on ignore for being a habitual line stepper. You may get your wish once I'm done triggering you. On my timeline, not yours though. ;)
 
Back
Top