Quote from Maverick1:
Calling what we are in know a trading range presupposes that you are taking a position on direction. By definition, a trading range is a directionless.
You are operating on a different set of assumptions and definitions of trend. Trends are fractal in nature. They happen on a 5 min chart, they happen on a quarterly chart. No one has any PATENT on the definition of trend. And that will remain the case until technical analysis is rigorously (and I don't mean Edwards and Mcgee) defined and classified. Which will probably never happen btw.
You're right, it is my prerogative to call what I described above trends. I do not derive this from my own analysis, but from Victor Sperandeo's methods. You are also free to disagree with Trader Vic. That's fine. That's the beauty of the market.
As for your comments on what consitutes the 'best' entries, Using Trader Vic's methodology, you can often set up trades with fantastic risk rewards. But you don't identify with his way of classifying trends so there is no reason for me to go any further into the setups and attempt a defense. I have no interest in a debate here. They are pointless, to me.
Best,
Maverick.
True, if we look at a 5 year chart (where every bar is 5 years), we're in one massive bull market!
