I have wondered why so many investment professionals would rather sell their advice than run money. Why would they peddle their newsletter tips for only $50/mo instead of managing a $100M fund? Wouldn't you rather be a Wall street big shot than a retail peddler?
I think it is v. simple economics. Running a fund requires hiring expensive help (analysts/traders/legal) while the overhead for publishing and marketing a newsletter may be much less (cold caller/household lists/direct marketing service). Building a fund requires convincing wealthy individuals or institutions, while marketing a newsletter uses mail/advertising to generate volume.
The rewards can be better. If you manage a $100M fund you'll gross about $1.5M in annual fees and possibly also get performance fees as well (though not if you are organized as a mutual fund). If you can get just 5000 subscribers for $50/mo. or $600/yr. for your newsletter you'll gross $3M. Although you may not be able to get performance fees, if you do well you'll attract more subscribers. If you are managing money getting more money may be counterproductive to your future performance, not to mention a headache as to where to put it all. A newsletter does not have to worry about how a subscriber's places his own money.
So, if you are a great trader, don't try to start a hedge fund, start your own newsletter and let it ride
I think it is v. simple economics. Running a fund requires hiring expensive help (analysts/traders/legal) while the overhead for publishing and marketing a newsletter may be much less (cold caller/household lists/direct marketing service). Building a fund requires convincing wealthy individuals or institutions, while marketing a newsletter uses mail/advertising to generate volume.
The rewards can be better. If you manage a $100M fund you'll gross about $1.5M in annual fees and possibly also get performance fees as well (though not if you are organized as a mutual fund). If you can get just 5000 subscribers for $50/mo. or $600/yr. for your newsletter you'll gross $3M. Although you may not be able to get performance fees, if you do well you'll attract more subscribers. If you are managing money getting more money may be counterproductive to your future performance, not to mention a headache as to where to put it all. A newsletter does not have to worry about how a subscriber's places his own money.
So, if you are a great trader, don't try to start a hedge fund, start your own newsletter and let it ride

. It will become more a marketing job than a trader's job. And if you are really serious you will have to support them especially since they are novices and so have employees that have a huge cost also. As for myself I decided not to do that (in fact my site doesn't accept members any more). It is preferable to address only professionals but then your product must be very good and you must have already cope with them. Since I have already given advices to traders of a big bank I know their need and it is less a headache to deal with professionals that don't need support than to deal with more novice public and so the human and marketing cost is far reduced.