Quote from drsteph:
Wouldn't put it past them to do a .25, see how the market responds, and then if it is a mega-down day, do another .25 right there and then.
Oops, sorry. We meant to say 50bps.
Kinda like "Sell 50? I thought you said, "That's nifty..""

Quote from Adobian:
Bernanke is powerless:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aaK_r.bfo7TI&refer=news
If Europe and Asia would have been down a total of 4-5% on Mon/Tue before US open they still could have done a surprise cut of maybe 50, but the extra oomph must have been caused by Soc Gen. And if the markets hadn't been down that much they could have waited until their scheduled announcement. So, I didn't mean that Soc Gen caused the whole thing but it became a catalyst that might have pushed both the timing forward and increased the size of the rate cut.Quote from DeepFried:
Everybody and their brother is saying that but with the S&P500 off 20% the Russell 2k off 25% how in the hell is the Fed supposedly jumping only because of weekend selling by SocGen?
That doesn't add up in my opinion.
Quote from sprstpd:
It is ridiculous that the Fed even looks at the stock market when deciding to cut or raise rates. The Fed is a joke. Rates need to be at least 400 bps higher in order to curb inflation. The Fed should be worried about inflation, not propping up a cry baby market.