Forget Chrysler, specifically, in this video. Assume he's making the same point about the interconnect between corporations and their debts and the ability of hedge funds to not only place bets and potentially profit handsomely on the survival of such companies, but to influence the outcome of such events.
Is he right, wrong...?
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Dr4RYso8RY&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Dr4RYso8RY&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
Is he right, wrong...?
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Dr4RYso8RY&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8Dr4RYso8RY&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>