What a good thread, finally.
As from ET statement and the motivation of the majority of us, we are here to support each other and grow together.
Who ever among us found values or support in his posts?
Were is the differance between his posts and most vulgar media style?
I would invite everyone on my thread - not only the subject of the proposed ban who is arrogant, litigious and incompetent. He is a never stopping liar, shows the climax of stupidity and total abcense of every human value. But he is also UBS's troll, for what I can prove.
But I will make simple questions and if he is not a troll and wishes not to be banned, he will have to answer with facts, not personal insults as he always does.
www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/trading-couple-for-3-years-are-harassed-by-ubs-bahamas-your-help-will-bring-victory.320417/page-28
How he obtained followed facts:
1. Our house had fire damage
2. Our house had water damages (lie)
3. Some of our beds were on the floor (Japanese's tatami style, which for his"high"intellectc means scandal)
4. house was full of cat feces (ridiculous lie, unless he had access after our eviction and the cats were hidden during the 3-hour violent ride)
5. we had an engineering business
There is plain evidence that he is degrading ET's values with his presence, posts, and activity.
Summarizing all the above and gems by OP, tge question appears to be - would we like to maintain a
certain level of the conversation between us, why should we keep a person who isn't adding any value, unless we are reputing values as insults, offences and lack of respect of privacy combined with total absence of spirit, compassion, solidarity and natural law values.
As from ET statement and the motivation of the majority of us, we are here to support each other and grow together.
Who ever among us found values or support in his posts?
Were is the differance between his posts and most vulgar media style?
I would invite everyone on my thread - not only the subject of the proposed ban who is arrogant, litigious and incompetent. He is a never stopping liar, shows the climax of stupidity and total abcense of every human value. But he is also UBS's troll, for what I can prove.
But I will make simple questions and if he is not a troll and wishes not to be banned, he will have to answer with facts, not personal insults as he always does.
www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/trading-couple-for-3-years-are-harassed-by-ubs-bahamas-your-help-will-bring-victory.320417/page-28
How he obtained followed facts:
1. Our house had fire damage
2. Our house had water damages (lie)
3. Some of our beds were on the floor (Japanese's tatami style, which for his"high"intellectc means scandal)
4. house was full of cat feces (ridiculous lie, unless he had access after our eviction and the cats were hidden during the 3-hour violent ride)
5. we had an engineering business
There is plain evidence that he is degrading ET's values with his presence, posts, and activity.
Summarizing all the above and gems by OP, tge question appears to be - would we like to maintain a
certain level of the conversation between us, why should we keep a person who isn't adding any value, unless we are reputing values as insults, offences and lack of respect of privacy combined with total absence of spirit, compassion, solidarity and natural law values.
