Nope. That's not my model. lol.
So then show us the math and statistics you are employing.but both you and i know better. it is not gambling. so just like sports betting...it is all in the math...
That's a helluva an article....but it went right over my head. I didn't even understand the "opening" vs. "closing" comparison. Perhaps I need to buy one of his books.
So then show us the math and statistics you are employing.
I believe every randomly entered trade(buy or sell) of an asset or option is objectively a zero expected value trade(fair pricing). If that’s not the case, why would anyone enter the market and take the opposite side of your trade?
Ofcourse, we can say some form of technical/fundamental analysis gives us an edge by timing our entry(instead of random) but that is just subjective. Simply put, I see the market as an almost complete random walk. It’s hard to prove that timed market entry is any better than a random coin flip.
Example: I buy eurusd(randomly) with a take profit of 25pips and Stop loss of 75pips. Are you telling my win-rate would still be 50/50? I expected my win rate to be 75%, bring me expected value to zero.
{25pips*75%-75pips*25%=0 pips}
Well someone might say that based on TA, that by not entering trades randomly, the above trade is still a 50/50 win-rate but again that’s subjective.
Now imagine I have a coin that heads have a 75% chance of showing up(biased). I bet on heads and every time I loose $1 or make $1, why would anyone take the other side of that bet? That’s similar to my eurusd example above(random work), isn’t it? I am looking at the market from same perspective .
I don’t know if you understand my point?
That's a helluva an article....but it went right over my head. I didn't even understand the "opening" vs. "closing" comparison. Perhaps I need to buy one of his books.
Didn't realize it was a "knock knock" joke. Sorry. Thought was a serious discussion of OP's question.
Yes I am definitely confused about that topic. What the difference between zero expected value and zero excess profit?No I think you are confusing zero expected value with zero excess profit due to price efficiency theory but in reality that's not the case. There are excess profit to be made thus the expected value of each trade is definitely not zero. And to be profitable, it's not just the win rate that matters. It's also how much you win vs. how much you lose on each trade. If your win rate is 50/50, but each time you win, you can win twice as much as you lose, you still come out ahead.
uhh no. But you are green alright.Let me look at stats from my sports betting journal right now. I started my sports betting this year on 1/30/22. I have made 149 sport bets so far…and I’m green ytd. You looking at one right now.
uhh no. But you are green alright.