Pathetic. Forgot your OP already. If I ever get a case of Alzheimer's like yours, I'll shoot myself (yes, some liberals own guns).Quote from Hello:
At what point did i say that the obama admin waterboarded people?

Quote from kut2k2:
Brilliant rebuttal to my first post btw.
You asked for a response, then you run away like a little bitch.Quote from Hello:
I talk to people who are worth arguing, I respond to comments worth responding too. If you make a completely irrationlal quote, you shoulndnt expect a response. I just found a piece of lint in my belly button that holds more value then you do.
You are a sad, sad little child. Thanks for pointing out why you deserve to join bugjuice and other time vampires in my ignore list.Quote from Hello:
Eagerly awaiing a left wing response to explain how Obama isnt a war Criminal.

Quote from kut2k2:
It's safe to say that you are a complete fool.
What waterboarding do you hallucinate took place under Obama? All that crap took place under Bush, and the Bushies are claiming Bush should get "credit" for contributing to the mission as a result of THEIR waterboarding. As usual, you fuckwits are trying to have it both ways: Obama "somehow" used waterboarding to get intel BUT ALSO all the intel from waterboarding means Bush gets credit.
As far as Obama "starting new wars", exactly zero Americans have died as a result of airstrikes on Libya, and 5000 died as a result of Bush's invasion and occupation of Iraq. Not that I expect you to appreciate the difference because, what, being a wingnut is brain damaging? Yeah based on all the evidence, I'm going with that one.
Poor baby, I know you're scared. You can no longer play that lameass "weak on defense" card in 2012. Sucks to be you.![]()
Quote from Ricter:
Ok, apparently waterboarding has not taken place under Obama, at least legally/to our knowledge. Let's move on. The next assertion is that all that "crap" (waterboarding) took place under Bush. Well, no, a glance at wikipedia indicates waterboarding has a longer history. Does that latter fact support the idea that Obama may be a war criminal? Perhaps, but if it does, other presidents may be as well. Anyway, the score is 1 to 1.
I could go on, but instead I'll submit that that one point awarded disqualifies the reply as the "dumbest fuck post in ET's history". Especially in light of the recent conspiracy posts.