Is it just me, or did the NRA speaker come across like a full blown psychopath?

Quote from bigarrow:

You're giving me advise about thinking, that's a joke. I know you're trying to be witty, a fail but at least you tried. You're conservative (closed ) minded thinking doesn't even allow you to read my post clearly. My statement was everyone is for some arms control, period. I didn't say more or less and I said the discussion should be where to draw the line. But I doubt you can comprehend this statement either so continue with your delusional thinking.
Hope you have a nice Christmas Lucrum.

Our children are dying. And you want keep up the left v right nonsense along with arguing semantics, splitting hairs and sticking to the very bleeding heart liberal agenda largely responsible for the problem in the first place?
 
Quote from bigarrow:

And you are for some arms control too. The discussion is where to draw the line, and it's a discussion we should have. We as in America.

Well obviously dipshit, people ideally would draw the line just like everything else in a free market society.
An intersection of their personal utility and their budget.
:cool:
 
Why do all these anti-gun zealots continue to ignore the fact that Connecticut already had draconian gun laws that prohibited assault weapons among other things?

Could it be that protecting the children is not their real goal?

If a draconian state law wasn't sufficient, why will forcing the same ridiculous laws on every state be the answer?
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Why do all these anti-gun zealots continue to ignore the fact that Connecticut already had draconian gun laws that prohibited assault weapons among other things?

Could it be that protecting the children is not their real goal?

If a draconian state law wasn't sufficient, why will forcing the same ridiculous laws on every state be the answer?

Liberals don't give a shit about anything but power(ie totalitarian govt is their utopia), the rest is just lying obfuscation.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Why do all these anti-gun zealots continue to ignore the fact that Connecticut already had draconian gun laws that prohibited assault weapons among other things?



Could it be that protecting the children is not their real goal?
I concluded some time ago they don't give a rats ass about school safety.
They simply have a bug up their butt about guns. The recent shootings are nothing but a fortuitous excuse to further their agenda.

If a draconian state law wasn't sufficient, why will forcing the same ridiculous laws on every state be the answer?
It won't be the answer, it won't even improve the situation. The Columbine shooting occurred right in the middle of the "assault weapons ban". In fact the shooters violated no less than 20 separate firearms laws accumulating their weapons.

If laws work so well why not just skip the firearms bull shit and simply outlaw mass shootings and murder to begin with?
 
Back
Top