Is it dangerous not to specify that you are employed in your broker account?

No. I would rather not. However, this is pretty standard procedure and I suspect applies to most banks that trade. Working for an employer that trades always comes with restrictions on your own trading. It's just the way it is
 
vanzandt said:
:D
Some of these threads....

I think ya'll just like to argue.
Like a bunch of old men at a barber-shop.
More...
I think this is the modern day equivalent of the barber shop, plus we can do our day job on the side!
 
Sig said:
I think this is the modern day equivalent of the barber shop, plus we can do our day job on the side!
More...
Need a checker board.
Wonder if Baron could somehow or the other embed a small chess or checkerboard that 2 members could go head to head on real time for all the world to see... there'd be a line to play...kinda like setting your quarters on a pool table. Actually that would be pretty fun to watch whilst waiting for the next trade set-up.
 
speedo said:
Competent underwriting requires from the borrower both the willingness AND the ability to make the payments. It is more difficult to gauge the ability with the unemployed and requires a more rigorous approach. Obviously in the pre-crises Frank-Dodd era of mortgage paper, underwriting was an afterthought.
More...
%%
True, Speedo,not that unemployed is anywhere near self employed+ its a shame they had to pass a bill the size of Dodd-Frank to stop banks [maybe,LOL] from risking taxpayer$ back up for insane leverage .I see AIG Greenburg agrees to return a fraud based multi-million bonus, on AIG fraud+ pay NY AG $9,000,000 fine[FOX Business FEB,2017]
 
I just said i was unemployed(which was true,btw,although i had a share in some entity).But that was about 10 y.ago.Is it any different now?I`m/was at that time in Russia as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top