Is Israel preparing to strike Iran?

[WAKE-UP]

Quote from tradermaji:

david duke is a convicted felon and a fraud. I don't hink he has given up on his bigoted philosophies, whether he resigned from the klan or not. I will not waste my time reading his crap.

Do you know he wrote a self help book for women under a pseudoname?

All that's proven is that someone wrote that book under a pseudonym. It's certainly possible that Duke wrote it but that's far from proven. According to Duke - Dorothy Vanderbilt was the pen name of a female friend of his, who wrote the book. At her request, he contributed a chapter to the book, something along the lines of "how to keep a man happy."

Sure, he is a felon and he may have been addicted to gambling, but, again, that doesn't make him a bad researcher. There are plenty of politicians with worse records than Duke who aren't constantly attacked for their past.

 

[PLATER]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Israel seeks all clear for Iran air strike

By Con Coughlin in Tel Aviv
Last Updated: 3:33pm GMT 24/02/2007

Israel is negotiating with the United States for permission to fly over Iraq as part of a plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.

To conduct surgical air strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, Israeli war planes would need to fly across Iraq. But to do so the Israeli military authorities in Tel Aviv need permission from the Pentagon.

(Notice how the story claims that Israel doesn't need Iraq's permission, only the permission of the US occupation forces in Iraq)

A senior Israeli defence official said negotiations were now underway between the two countries for the US-led coalition in Iraq to provide an "air corridor" in the event of the Israeli government deciding on unilateral military action to prevent Teheran developing nuclear weapons.

"We are planning for every eventuality, and sorting out issues such as these are crucially important," said the official, who asked not to be named.

"The only way to do this is to fly through US-controlled air space. If we don't sort these issues out now we could have a situation where American and Israeli war planes start shooting at each other."

As Iran continues to defy UN demands to stop producing material which could be used to build a nuclear bomb, Israel's military establishment is moving on to a war footing, with preparations now well under way for the Jewish state to launch air strikes against Teheran if diplomatic efforts fail to resolve the crisis.

The pace of military planning in Israel has accelerated markedly since the start of this year after Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, provided a stark intelligence assessment that Iran, given the current rate of progress being made on its uranium enrichment programme, could have enough fissile material for a nuclear warhead by 2009.

Last week Ehud Olmert, the Israeli prime minister, announced that he had persuaded Meir Dagan, the head of Mossad for the past six years and one of Israel's leading experts on Iran's nuclear programme, to defer his retirement until at least the end of next year.

Mr Olmert has also given overall control of the military aspects of the Iran issue to Eliezer Shkedi, the head of the Israeli Air Force and a former F-16 fighter pilot.

The international community will increase the pressure on Iran when senior officials from the five permanent of the United Nations Security Council and Germany meet at an emergency summit to be held in London on Monday.

Iran ignored a UN deadline of last Wednesday to halt uranium enrichment. Officials will discuss arms controls and whether to cut back on the $25 billion-worth of export credits which are used by European companies to trade with Iran.

A high-ranking British source said: "There is a debate within the six countries on sanctions and economic measures."

British officials insist that this "incremental" approach of tightening the pressure on Iran is starting to turn opinion within Iran. One source said: "We are on the right track. There is time for diplomacy to take effect."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/24/wiran124.xml

Attack is the best form of defence

 

[tradermaji]

He is a felon and his statements should all be taken with sack full of salt. He is still a racist.

"He essentially ended his dalliance with “moderation” in late 1998 with the self-publication of a 700-page autobiography, My Awakening. In this magnum opus, Duke attempted to prove that blacks are genetically inferior to whites, while devoting almost 250 pages to anti-Jewish themes. "

http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/duk..._SubCat=Extremism_in_America&xpicked=2&item=4



The above is young duke at work.

From the first reference, here are some great nuggets of wisdom (NOT) from duke.

“White people don't need a law against rape, but if you fill this room up with your normal black bucks, you would, because niggers are basically primitive animals.”

—The Sun (Wichita, Kan.), April 23, 1975

"What we really want to do is to be left alone. We don't want Negroes around. We don't need Negroes around. We're not asking –– you know, we don't want to have them, you know, for our culture. We simply want our own country and our own society. That's in no way exploitive at all. We want our own society, our own nation...."

–-Duke interview with doctoral student Evelyn Rich, who traveled around the country with Duke while conducting research for her dissertation on the KKK, March 1985


And you claim a person with this kind of attitude is to be believed?

 

[pamjoey]

i agree with you traderm. To use Duke, or someone like him, probably isnt going to mean much, to most people

 

[FanOfFridays]

Since the piece of garbage is involved here, I'll provide a quick reminder.

quote from WAKE-UP
Is pedophilia a True Crime? The answer, I think, is clearly No. No one has ever shown that pedophilia harms anyone, and all claims of harm are purely speculative.....There is, however, one way in which pedophilia is frequently harmful, namely, that it causes the perpetrators to spend substantial time behind bars

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=86933

I asked him whether he really believed that it was the attacker that was the victim in a pedophilic attack. Here's his response. Sit down, and grab a bucket.

quote from the disgusting piece of filth, WAKE-Up, aka PLATO2
I actually agree with that, yes, I do not believe that those who commit these acts are guilty. I believe that they are victims of the system, which brought them to their deed. Not everyone can handle the constant bombardment of sex and titillation on television and on the internet. There will always be people who get frustrated to a point where they go out and commit rape. Pedophilic rape is not the individual's fault but society's fault, and society should be blamed. The individual is not responsible for raping the child - it is society that has raped.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1364521#post1364521

 

[tradermaji]

All I am saying, try to use someone more credible than klansman duke as your source. You don't need to bad mouth some one else trying to prove duke's credibility. He has ZERO, if not negative credibility.