Quote from Wappers2:
Harry,
probabilitically speaking, you are reversing into a Feynman bubble, with overtones of less than Jungian neuronal relationships, personality-wise. This introspected post-deconstructionist bible-studying you do is entertaining in the extreme, and answers many of the riddles posed by our quasi-technocratic loose consortium of econohobbits. With hindsight, the bread is stale though, and toast is most likely the intermediate/long term outcome of your brookesyan babblings. Wooly Mammoth. The rationale behind your conundrums is scintillating - as Adam Smith once said - "is there any more sugar?" and we all (with a single notable exception) remember well where THAT lead. Perhaps the single factor missing from your equations right now can best be summed up as "why are some croissants straight, while others are crescent shaped?" and no, the difference between butter and margarine is no more a causal factor than that Suft always places winning trades while wearing his purple paisley hawaiian stubbies. Keep it coming, little french dude!
