I would not dismiss imagination as trivial. In fact I would say that without imagination there would be no science at all. We would never question the conventional wisdom of the time. Imagination was all that our ancient ancestors had as they viewed the heavens. What if was the question. What if we had something that could see beyond out own eyes? What if is the question every person of science must have. It's imagination that drives us. None of this is settled science/belief, no matter how much the political ideology of any party wants it to be.
And yet you dismissed my imagination, (albeit self-evidently a little more than mere imagination), for Mother Goose being in an equivalency with God. You called it childish.(and God isn't?!
If you were asked to imagine what might enable you to ascend into the sky like a bird, would you imagine Jack's Beanstalk, or have the imagination to think of things in the way of aerodynamics. If you do the former, that's trivial.
I'm saying it's trivial to imagine anything is possible only because you imagine it is. You may imagine God or a Higher Consciousness, I imagine something more than God and higher than a Higher Consciousness. Both our imaginations in that regard are trivial.
Last edited:

