Why are their charts so difference?
What makes up the differences?
![]()
Thanks.
There is some indication in this Cato paper that the writer does not correctly understand why the Fed decided it would be useful to pay a small interest on excess reserves. Also this: "As a result, the introduction of interest on reserves in October 2008 and the resulting accumulation of reserves by banks not only caused a collapse of Federal funds lending from over $200 billion to nearly a third of that"... I think is backwards. But it is too late in the evening for me to think clearly. Perhaps I'll comment on this later.
One of the reasons why I asked the original question was that it was unclear why the Monetary Base chart did not increase in the recent round of easing, while the Total Assets did.
Some twitters say that the Fed is doing quantitative easing again, but it is not reflected in the Monetary Base above.