Quote from Swan Noir:
That's ridiculous. The IRS takes a look at the recent trading in the private placement market for unregistered shares and values it. If his return has valued it differently he will lose the battle.
Value it a zero? That's truly delusional.
Quote from PocketChange:
http://www.hantzmonwiebel.com/live_data/documents/ruling-59-60.pdf
Read Section 8: Restrictive Agreements.
This is a estate planning strategy: Facebook has a restrictive repurchase agreement setting a price of $0.01 per share. This restrictive agreement expires upon IPO.
"Frequently, in the valuation of closely held stock for estate and gift tax purposes, it will be found that the stock is subject to an agreement restricting its sale or transfer. Where shares of stock were acquired by a decedent subject to an option reserved by the issuing corporation to repurchase at a certain price, the option price is usually accepted as the fair market value for estate tax purposes. See Rev. Rul. 54-76, C.B. 1954-1, 194."
Future claims or litigation brought on by the IRS will have jurisdictional issues. The key for him is to renounce citizenship while these restrictions are in force and prior to the IPO.
Singapore is a country with No Capital Gains Tax. The government of Singapore would intervene in any IRS claims against its citizens.
Really is a brilliant move...
You tell me you wouldn't take the same path/chance of cashing out tax free?
Quote from Free Thinker:
in order for a business to succeed you need a lot of things. you need infrastructure ,security, an educated workforce, a court system to enforce contract law, patent protection, access to capital. all of this is provided at a cost to the public in the us. so now he wants to move to Singapore. how far do you think he would have made it if he had attempted to start a business like that in Singapore?
I think we as a country have a right to expect some payback for his ability to succeed. really he is screwing the other taxpayers
Quote from Free Thinker:
in order for a business to succeed you need a lot of things. you need infrastructure ,security, an educated workforce, a court system to enforce contract law, patent protection, access to capital. all of this is provided at a cost to the public in the us. so now he wants to move to Singapore. how far do you think he would have made it if he had attempted to start a business like that in Singapore?
I think we as a country have a right to expect some payback for his ability to succeed. really he is screwing the other taxpayers
Quote from logic_man:
I notice you didn't answer the man's question about whether you'd do the same thing, you just blathered about what you think this other guy should do, according to what you think is best in the abstract.
Hundreds of millions of people share the infrastructure in the US. 1% of them make it into "the 1%". Seems to me that those individuals should get the lion's share of their success since they CLEARLY are doing something that only they, out of the hundreds of millions who could do it, can do.
Also, how many of those resources did this guy actually consume above and beyond the taxes he had ALREADY paid? Unless you can put a number on that, the idea that he owes US citizens anything is a fallacy.
But, moochers don't care about fallacies, they care about mooching.
Quote from Free Thinker:
for a person calling themselves logic man you seem to be lacking in that quality.
if you know anything about business(doubtful) you would know that owners of startups probably pay little if any taxes. there are too many ways to hide income. the payoff is cap gains which is already taxed at a low 15%. 15% does not sound like too much for the oppertunity he was given.
it really doesnt matter how much he consumed. the business climate is priceless. he probably would have failed from Singapore and now he wants to run there for protection. shameful.
Quote from Free Thinker:
for a person calling themselves logic man you seem to be lacking in that quality.
if you know anything about business(doubtful) you would know that owners of startups probably pay little if any taxes. there are too many ways to hide income. the payoff is cap gains which is already taxed at a low 15%. 15% does not sound like too much for the oppertunity he was given.
it really doesnt matter how much he consumed. the business climate is priceless. he probably would have failed from Singapore and now he wants to run there for protection. shameful.