Is emini Russell 200 best mini to trade???

Quote from georgepruitt:

From a day trade standpoint I think the ER is the best. Most of the daytrade systems that we have been tracking over the years have performed much better in the ER as of late. The ER doesn't have the knee jerk reaction that is exhibited by the ES and intraday trends seem to last longer therefore providing more profit opportunity. Since the ER carries a bigger punch, execution fees are easily covered with winners. On the other hand, losers take a larger bite out of trading capital.

DAX maybe?
 
I came across this just now. If it has already been
posted I apologize.

Video shows worst case loss in exact same move
in RUS , ES, NQ and YM on a given day.

RUS $370 loss
ES $250 loss
NQ $193.75 loss
YM $ 170 loss

Graphs of all 4 are very much the same.
It seems the NQ and YM should be given
strong consideration for a trader with limited
funds just starting out. At least this is the idea
behind the video.

Play time: 8 minutes 25 seconds

http://puretick.com/video/bestindex/

-Stephen
 
Quote from stephenszpak:

I came across this just now. If it has already been
posted I apologize...

The video is misleading and there's an extensive prior discussion about such here at ET.

Simply, it comes down to one thing only.

Take whatever strategy your using and test the method on all the trading instruments your considering to trade.

The trading instruments that's the most profitable is the trading instrument that's suitable for your strategy and not suitable for the strategy used by someone else.

In other words, one trader using one particular method may find ER2 to be the best to trade whereas another trader using a completely different method may find ES the best to trade and so on for YM, NQ, DAX or whatever.

Mark
 
Hi Mark

What I got out of it, is that a *series of losses*
that would wipe out a small account using
the RUS or ES, would not wipe out an account
using the NQ or YM.

Dang, can't find my calculator.

Estimating now, using the NQ as a basline...
the ES loss is more than 25% more and the
RUS is 80% more, or whatever.

I think I got your point. Do you think I have a valid
point?

RUS $370 loss
ES $250 loss
NQ $193.75 loss
YM $ 170 loss


-Stephen
 
The video is indeed misleading, what the guy does not say is that the reverse of the same would have been in favor of ES. What if you had not made the wrong trade?!!!!..........Daaaaaaaa
don't beleive the BS people sell.
 
Cy M

I did take a quick look at the price action at the
top(s). All 4 graphs do show very similar price action.
This was another thing he mentioned. I don't think
a discretionary trader would find any real difference
trading any of these, solely from this particular
standpoint.

I'll have to review the posts here later today so I
can better understand these matters.

Slippage is mentioned here:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...&perpage=6&highlight=ym dow tick&pagenumber=1

Spectra wrote:

Since the dow is only $5/tick and the ES is $12.50/tick you can expect more slippage $ wise on the ES.


The liquidity data of the YM is very low if one
looks here:


http://www.traders.com/Documentation/FEEDbk_docs/Liquidity/FutLiq.html

Later,

-Stephen
 
The guy in the video is telling you in a non direct way, that since you are going to be a loser when you start trading futures, ym is the slow death compared to others futures.

Heh he is not totally wrong, this way you can keep paying his course a little bit longer till you are broken.

Smart guy! :p

Jokes aside, I think it's not a bad suggestion for someone who's a beginner.

Heck ,why not trading SPY or DYA with 100 shares. If you are not scalper, the charts patterns are basically the same. This way you are a step beyond papertrading , and looking at the P/L fluctuation is not going to cause a foggy brain.
 
Thanks mark1

Just got up so my brain is indeed a little foggy.
Trying to understand why these *4* exist. Trying
to understand the best answer to the poster's
question. I'll keep at it.

-Stephen
 
Back
Top