I'm not being sarcastic but don't all indicators have a mathematical model ?
There are a lot of things that are related to math. But there is also math and math...
I compare it to: I play tennis and Federer is playing tennis too. Can you compare us and say we do the same?
Trading is math as you buy and sell, so everything you do is math related. But there are huge differences if you go deeper in all the available and/or used math, and the way you use them. There is the difference.
I never used MACD, stochastics,Fibonacci, divergences, support/resistance...It seems to me that the basic mathematical models are stuff like stochastics, MACD, moving averages and so on. In contrast, the more advance mathematical models are those used in HFT, algorithms and such.
Also never read or studied these things. I wanted to start with a brain that was not spoiled or preconditioned by things that seemed to be useless to me. I never heard of somebody that became billionaire with this stuff although millions of people studied and used it. So chances to have success are near zero %.
And I also don't work like HFT's.
What to me is very important is to find the correct relations and the hierarchical order of these relations and how they work together. Chaos should become less chaos. That is only possible if you understand things that for others still is chaos. Find order in the disorder.
If I post result of my trading most people say:impossible. That's for me a sign that:
- what I do works but almost nobody has any clue how to arrive at these results.
- the classic free things on internet don't work. So it was a good not to look at this garbage and not waste time on it.
or getting stolen...