Is Daytrading a Random Event?

Originally posted by lundy
- the randomness in the market can be seen as perceived value

- the organization in the market can be seen as how the perceived value adjusts to real value (when its revealed)

sometimes perceived value is way off sometimes it's right on.

why did the naz go to 5000? because that was it's perceived value by the public. why is it hovering over 1000 right now? because thats it's perceived value.

what causes this randomness? inefficencies in the market. Perceived value is different from real value because someone wants it to be. In the end, when the money gets taken off the table, prices always go back to real value.

if there were no inefficiencies, there would be no market.

beautifully put.
 
The behavior of stocks can be construed as random, but this is irrelevant.

Your decision when to trade and when not to is NOT random. Your decision to hold on to a winning trade and systematically take profits is NOT random. Your decision to cut losses quickly and admit when you're wrong is NOT random. Your decision to develop a plan and religiously stick to it is NOT random (even if your plan is as primitive as throwing darts at a stock list).

It's not the effectiveness of the trade selection plan that's relevant, but your ability to manage risk, minimize losses and control your emotions. That is what brings order to the "randomness" of the stock market and enables traders to be consistently profitable.

I'm a classic daytrader (I end each day flat) and I have been net profitable in 24 of the past 27 days. My 3 negative days were very minimal. This is not the result of "randomness."
 
Originally posted by goldenarm
The behavior of stocks can be construed as random, but this is irrelevant.

Your decision when to trade and when not to is NOT random. Your decision to hold on to a winning trade and systematically take profits is NOT random. Your decision to cut losses quickly and admit when you're wrong is NOT random. Your decision to develop a plan and religiously stick to it is NOT random (even if your plan is as primitive as throwing darts at a stock list).

It's not the effectiveness of the trade selection plan that's relevant, but your ability to manage risk, minimize losses and control your emotions. That is what brings order to the "randomness" of the stock market and enables traders to be consistently profitable.

I'm a classic daytrader (I end each day flat) and I have been net profitable in 24 of the past 27 days. My 3 negative days were very minimal. This is not the result of "randomness."

I basically said this elsewhere but it was in more esoteric terms. I agree with you completely. Intelligence can deal with randomness.
 
Originally posted by lundy
- the randomness in the market can be seen as perceived value
Perceived value is different from real value because someone wants it to be.

In the end, when the money gets taken off the table, prices always go back to real value.



not to be a smart aleck, but:

there is no such thing as 'real' vs. 'perceived' value- as far as markets go it is all perception

as a complex system responding to millions of variables, the market's outcome has little to no correlation w/ individual desires

the money is never taken off the table, if it were the game would stop

If you mapped the extremes of the caribou population in the Yukon for the past 100 years, assuming a stable environment, and you went 'long' perceived low periods and 'short' perceived high periods, you might be able to make money (if someone were to take the other side of your trade). Why? Because cycles are built into the fabric of reality. Price, temperature, ocean currents, political careers, sports teams, quality of elite trader posts: it all goes back and forth.

One of the old commodity sayings is that the best cure for high prices is high prices (supply comes in) and the best for low is low (supply falls below demand). The system reacts to its own outliers, thus it is not the same as a coin flip. Extreme results have reversion tendency for reasons internal to the system, whereas coin flips do not. Thus the "gambler's fallacy" is a little too smug and pat for the real world.

When people buy too much they don't have enough money to buy anymore, so it goes down. When they panic and sell everything the bargains look good, so it goes up.

True genius seeks out simplicity within complexity (and in the case of trading, uses it to make money).
 
Originally posted by cmz1
poker is definitely more random in my eyes than the market; but, daytrading still sucks

LOL. That says it all. This is a guy who couldn't cut the mustard as a market maker (whatsa matter? makin' the spread on RAZF a bit tough eh? :)), and is now here giving daytrading a bash. What's next? Swingtrading is for the dogs??

For an academic rebuttall of efficient market crap, check out "A Non Random Walk Down Wall St".
 
my daytrading definitely sucks. i am finding it extremely difficult to gain an edge. my entire point of why it is random is due to a lack of liquidity. because of the liquidity issues stocks are gapping all the time. to me there has been no predictability with these price moves.
 
Futurecurrents,



You dropped the word that was missing on this
thread ; CHAOTIC

The markets are NOT random but CHAOTIC.

Someone with a scientific background understands
the difference.

There is ORDER in the chaos. Meaning that there
are patterns to be exploited. It takes experien-
ce to recognize those.

Just the fact that there are traders that can
make consistent profits day in, day out makes
it statistically significant.

Is human behavior random ? No, it's chaotic.
Is the weather random ? No, it's chaotic.

How many days in advance can the weather be
predicted accurately ?

Maximum 7 days with a certain degree of
accuracy.

Is it computer that limits us to those 7 days ?

NO, even with much more powerful computers
we will never be able to predict the weather
more than 14 days in advance with good
accuracy.
Just because the weather is chaotic.
A very small cause at the right moment can
have large consequences.

I make the analogy between the prediction of
the weather and the markets : The shorter
the time frame the more accurate the predictions
can be in trading.( "can" because this depends
from the skills of the trader)

I have to laugh when I hear people tell that
you are trading noise when your time frame
is too short...
 
you haven't a clue of what you speak. i did quite well as a market maker. i am sure your perceptions of that field are pure misinformation so please don't even go there. when my firm closed our office down here, i did not want to move. that business got hit hard due to the massive disinterest of the nasdaq.
i will not bash you b/c i don't pass judgement. But, i will persistently argue that daytrading for a living is a losing proposition. if you've done well and have been wise enough to put away money, then quit b.c. statistically speaking you will lose.
the percentages of failure do not lie. your ego may lie but the percentages don't
 
Originally posted by sabena


I have to laugh when I hear people tell that
you are trading noise when your time frame
is too short...


"One man's noise is another man's trend" - Daniel M
 
Originally posted by cmz1
my daytrading definitely sucks. i am finding it extremely difficult to gain an edge. my entire point of why it is random is due to a lack of liquidity. because of the liquidity issues stocks are gapping all the time. to me there has been no predictability with these price moves.


cmx1, l@@k again. there is gold in them there charts.
 
Back
Top