Exactly, NoD!
All we need as traders is have our trades make money over time. Some entries may have 60% hit rate, some may even have 30% hit rate (though, I prefer the higher probability signals), but as long as profits cover losses and put something on top, business is going well.
LOL, I love this one too... uh oh, most breakouts fail... SO WHAT?
I will not even touch the fact that there are many forms of breakouts and some of them are probably the highest probability trades I have ever met...
But seriously, are we trading to make money or to whine about the existence of losing trades... If most breakouts fail, but those which don't make more profit than all losses which are brought by failures combined, that's a GREAT BET!
Somehow people find it OK to buy lotto tickets or play casino knowing odds are way not in their favour, but find it absolutely unacceptable to ever, ever have a losing trade in the markets, even if the system has obviously positive expectation...
What a great game for psychologists to observe interesting phenomenons.
Frankly I tend to just scalp the immediate momentum myself, but I have seen others do as you said: take a few tries to catch the big swing with scalp-like fine-tuned entry... My experience is, it still pays off very well overall, because even if you try say 3-5 times, get 2 losses of 4 ES ticks + comm, 2 breakevens + comm, which would total roughly 11-12 ticks of costs and on the 5th time catch the move of 50 ticks, you still have a much better equity curve shape than if you risk 10 ticks from the start to get the same 50 ticks, because some losses happen there too...
Cannot say definitely which way is better, it seems to be more correlated with particular trader's comfort zone indeed, but both ways "work" if applied consistently.
Brother Oily, you are surprised that trading setups are not infallible or what? Maybe you're also embarrassed with the fact trading losses exist?
Of course TA setups fail at times, which are usually great opposite setups. What's the problem I don't get... Just TRADE THE CRAP and make money already, ha.
As my great old friend, who also mentored NoDoji once said "how many traders fail, because they are always seeking instead of just performing".
Watch the market until you "see things" and just trade what works more often than not, how easier can it get?
Hahaha... No, actually I ask myself why the hell did I spend my time trading Euro for 9-10 hours every day when can make more trading CL for two hours...
Also about to trade NQ, which is liquid enough, but not as fat (and slow) as ES. Yesterday morning was a beautiful day, one of those you don't care not only about the spread, but also some slippage doesn't hurt you at all.
Speaking on the matter of the thread, I think HFT seriously harms scalpers who exploited the smallest possible moves in the markets thus competing with HFT in the same niche.
For us, momentum traders, algos provided a lot of additional liquidity and exaggerate some moves, which is rather good than bad news.
Why do you keep denying reality, Surf? I indeed showed you 50+ trades live track record, all real-time, all 3rd party verified. Out of those 50+ trades done over the course of a couple of months most days were profitable and it's not just a lucky coincidence.
Did countless amount of live trades in front of other people, many of whom are years old members of ET from different areas of the world. NoDoji did pretty much the same I believe.
We do it to show people that successful trading is possible for anyone who really is ready to deliberately learn this craft. What scares you so much about this fact?
I seriously care.
So Cornix, what gives? I thought Nodoji gave you a clear cut can't lose surefire way to make a killing like her. You talked a pretty tough game to Surf for many months on here. These greatest hits almost seem comical now in hindsight don't they?


