I think daytrading is worth it if you happen to have an 'edge'. Higher frequency of trading give more opportunity to explot the edge and make more money.
Problem is, practically nobody here has an edge, so whether 'swing trading' or 'daytrading', you'll lose either way in the long run.
Swing trading more infrequently makes it hard to build up a sample of any statistical significance and might fool people into thinkin they have an edge when it's just random luck.
There's a trader on trade2win called 'dowjones' who posts his statements who seems to one of the few with a genuine edge. Seems to trade about 50 times per day on the dax making a good few K per day.
Probably doesn't use charts/TA ect (all successful traders don't use the things we are aware of, but don't tend to let us know what they DO use!)
Only time I had an edge and was printing money for a period, was when exploiting a slow feed of a european spreadbet company and I was making lots of money every day until they closed my account a month or so down the line!
It's about edge rather than swing vs day trading. Look at the PNL thread nowadays compared to years gone by. Basically nobody is making money.
+1
Spot on. You need to have an edge. And daytrading around doji's and moving averages is NOT an edge. Although ET has their fair share of snake oil salesmen peddling that crap...for a fee. But you are correct, it matters not what your holding time is whether you trade stocks or futures or options or FX, one is not better or worse. You need an edge. Now some of those markets it's much harder to find an edge. I find it beyond laughable that people here claim to have an edge trading ES, the most efficient market in the world. But to each their own.
)