Quote from oldtime:
no kidding, I suppose an astute stock analyst could have known something was wrong, but you would think IB has a few astute analysts employed and they were first in line to buy it.
Failure to sweep with no advance warning and no explanation (as if that would make a difference) puts me on notice.
But you make a good point. MF was great until it was bad, and IB was trying to buy it until they weren't.
Quote from opt789:
Why is everyone assuming that the SIPC suddenly told IB they could not do it but they have not told TD Ameritrade anything?
Quote from Nick29:
Penson/MBTrading have apparently done the same thing. So it's probably industry wide.
yeah that's the way I heard it also, according to Bloomberg they backed right off when as you say the millions were unaccounted forQuote from SideShowBob:
From what I read (and that's only as good as the source....) IB was trying to buy it until it saw hundreds of millions missing .... it might be worth overpaying for bankrupt assets to get customers, but not taking on unknown liability from Corzine....
Quote from oldtime:
yeah that's the way I heard it also, according to Bloomberg they backed right off when as you say the millions were unaccounted for
Quote from Options12:
From this report it looks like IB was still interested after they learned of the shortfall. So I don't know if it's fair to say they "backed right off."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/must-...nute-breakdown-doomed-brokers-last-week-alive