Is Bill Gates Right? Should We Kill 90% Of The Human Population?

There is a wide theory that the long lock down was actually an exercise for a Nuclear war and aftermath. I guess it supposed USA would be forced to use Nukes after losing a few carriers. But on the Bill Gates premise, they don't really mind losing large amounts of the population... People in mountainous regions USA (read Colorado Underground Fortress) would be able to move about getting supplies in the same way that lock down USA was able to..in a limited fashion with curfew and other similar scenario.
%%
Could be ;
+ the chicoms may prefer thier virus bioweapon/less damage to US buildings, many are full of chicom spies.............................................................................................:caution::caution:
 
Klaus Schwab and his great fascist reset

Schwab is deeply connected to that world, being on a “first-name basis” with Bill Gates and having been hailed by Big Pharma mainstay Henry McKinnell, chairman and CEO of Pfizer Inc, as “a person truly dedicated to a truly noble cause”.


So it is not surprising that he insists, with Malleret, that “a full return to ‘normal’ cannot be envisaged before a vaccine is available”. (136)


He adds: “The next hurdle is the political challenge of vaccinating enough people worldwide (we are collectively as strong as the weakest link) with a high enough compliance rate despite the rise of anti-vaxxers”. (137)


“Anti-vaxxers” thus join Schwab’s list of threats to his project, along with anti-globalization and anti-capitalist protesters, Gilets Jaunes and all those engaged in “class conflicts”, “societal resistance” and “political backlash”.


The majority of the world’s population have already been excluded from decision-making processes by the lack of democracy which Schwab wants to accentuate through his stakeholderist corporate domination, his “agile governance”, his totalitarian “system management of human existence”.


But how does he envisage dealing with the “sombre scenario” of people rising up against his great newnormalist reset and his transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution?


What degree of “force” and “coercive measures” would he be prepared to accept in order to ensure the dawning of his technocratic new age?


The question is a chilling one, but we should also bear in mind the historical example of the 20th century regime into which Schwab was born.


Hitler’s new Nazi normal was meant to last for a thousand years, but came crashing down 988 years ahead of target.

https://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/
 
Back
Top