The definition of inerrant is....
1. Incapable of erring; infallible.
2. Containing no errors.
Definition 1 doesn't fit because the bible is not a living book. It does not grow and change. It is what it is....
Does it contain errors???
I am sure there may be some misquotes. After all, prior to it becoming a written collection of documents, It was handed down verbally. So as a previous respondent said, there may be some interpretational errors based on who told the story, their opinions. personal status, etc...
Does that mean the stories in it are MISREPRESENTED?? No.
If 50 people see the same event and each gave their own account, you could easily extrapolate from those 50 viewpoints what really occurred.
This is the Bible as we know it. A multiplicity of accounts extrapolated.
Luke (The Author of Acts and Luke) for one went about gathering information of events from various persons. He was able, with a high degree of accuracy, to recreate the original events quite well.
Without flaw?? Doubt it. Perfect, Nope. But a very honest and useful resource, Yes.