\Quote from ginux:
C2 is NOT saying the same thing. They allow users to autotrade systems from publishers who ARE NOT registered.
I gave you the direct quote right off the FAQ that was referred to earlier.
What I may respectfully say is that you are not reading/understanding properly. C2 has to register. Their CUSTOMERS (who allow auto trading to happen in their own personal account) obviously do not register.
Further, it seems that some of C2 customers are offering similar services to other people? If so, then the same rule applies. If a customer of C2 has his own customers and for them he trades or auto-trades the account for members of the public at large, he would then register. Regester not because he is a customer of C2, but register because he is trading other people's money.
Or if I am misreading your statements myself and you mean literally "They allow users to autotrade systems from publishers who ARE NOT registered." again, so what? it is the so called "publisher" who makes the decision to register of not. That's his concern and is between him and the SEC and the State regulatory bodies. It is not legally "your concern" per se. It's a "free country" and you can pay with your own money for services from unlicensed and unregistered people all day long if you like.
In any event, the C2 FAQ page was clear as day on the matter. Or could you post the actual text (and provide the link) for what it is that is in dispute here?