Quote from 0008:
Near every text book says arbitrage is risk-free. If it was true, why didn't all the institutions trade on it and never had any loss?
True arbitrage is risk free.
But the more who know of an opportunity the smaller the pot.
Buying gold in the US for $8 an ounce and selling it milliseconds later in Europe for $12 is extremely low risk. Anyone who can find this will use large amounts of money and do it over and over and over again.
So since all of the buying of gold in the US is going on it goes to $10 an ounce while all the selling of Gold in Europe it goes down to $11. The spread narrowed. Soon it gets to 11.55 in the US and in Europe it becomes $11.60
The spread narrows. One of the reasons I do not ever talk about any sort of arbitrage opportunities. Helping others won't match what I can make.
There are forms of risk Arbitrage. Where you aren't dealing with the exact same thing. Then you have news that can potentially hurt the deal.
A buddy of mine once found an opportunity with a few small stocks where if you were a shareholder you could buy stocks directly from the company for a 10% discount.
They didn't have in the contract this was for small shareholders only. He ran a fund, he was able to get some rather large backing for his opportunity and pissed off a few CFO's in the process as he would pour millions into these programs.
Soon the writing was changed to say this deal is for small shareholders, with a limited # of shares you can buy
Robert