I suppose it depends on what you're looking for. When I chose NQ, I looked at both setup reliability and volatility as measured by directional movement in relation to ~average bar range in my chosen time frame. At the time, NQ scored better overall than ES for my purposes, and better in terms of setup reliability than YM and ER2 (now TF). I suppose NQ is less glamorous than some of the hot markets that everyone talks about on ET, but it still gets the job done. I just didn't know it had such a dismal following here.Quote from SomeYoungGuy:
I think even the crickets left. lol
The nas100, dow, and s&p500 all have such a tight correlation that one is the same as another, so you might as well only trade the most liquid.
Plus, one single tick in ES covers both sides of commission plus puts double that much coin in your pocket. YM and NQ barely cover commission with 1 tick.
Quote from Gabfly1:
I suppose it depends on what you're looking for. When I chose NQ, I looked at both setup reliability and volatility as measured by directional movement in relation to ~average bar range in my chosen time frame. At the time, NQ scored better overall than ES for my purposes, and better in terms of setup reliability than YM and ER2 (now TF). I suppose NQ is less glamorous than some of the hot markets that everyone talks about on ET, but it still gets the job done. I just didn't know it had such a dismal following here.