Is anyone here counter trade in strong trending future mkt?

Quote from Grob109:

The discussion here is about that is unfamiar to you. Your reference is to something other than what is being discussed here.

It is never going to be possible for you to understand what I discuss for a whole load of reasons.

If you ever think you know what is being addressed, then rethink it until you dtermine that you do not know what is going on.

Tap is not tape. And also tape is not tap.

You do tap

I do tape.

This is why you think the thread is funny. You are not understanding anything and so it is appropriate for you to have a laugh.

You make us laugh too.

What is well known to us is that a picture is created when a person understands "taping out" the 20/80 region of STOC. What we do mentally is unroll some electrical tape (black is preferred) and we place it so it fits exactly between the 20 and 80 % on the STOC.

We also use "tape" on a specific kind of channel.

We are not doing woodpecker stuff here.

While you seem to be pecking away at zillions of knot holes you "see"; it could be that you look like a road runner shooting off in all directions and having litttle, if any, reading comprehension.


What a dumb and stupid post you have made.


Before you call others' posts stupid, take a look at yours. I am not gonna start arguing about the BS you have posted in this thread(as well as others) because it will only end up in babble. Some of what you say makes sense and some of it is pure crap. Overall your posts end up as babble because you either pretend to or truly lack simple communication skills. Some of your defenders may say that there is no reason you should try to "talk down" to the rest of the posters but I call bull crap on that. It's simple communication skills. How do you get by in life by turning simple concepts into pure babble?

The best traders I know can easily explain what they do and how they trade in a few sentences. I know only one that takes a very scientific approach that is kinda hard to explain and to be honest, I am not impressed. So cut the crap and stop pretending to be so esoteric. You may fool a few on this site and had me wondering about your pseudo scientific approach, but I know enough to know that it's all BS. I read all your threads and there are quite a few times when you were called out and shown to be a liar and full of it. Remember the programmer incident?

I'm sure you trade and I'm sure you make money. Yet, I do believe that you are not that great and are not making millions. Actually I really do not care and I am not asking to see your results. I just would like to see some of your trades.

Do this. Post some of your trades, preferably both correct and wrong ones. Then simply explain your entries and exits. No mumbo jumbo required.
 
nitro :confused:

Quote from Grob109:

The discussion here is about that is unfamiar to you. Your reference is to something other than what is being discussed here.

It is never going to be possible for you to understand what I discuss for a whole load of reasons.

If you ever think you know what is being addressed, then rethink it until you dtermine that you do not know what is going on.

Tap is not tape. And also tape is not tap.

You do tap

I do tape.

This is why you think the thread is funny. You are not understanding anything and so it is appropriate for you to have a laugh.

You make us laugh too.

What is well known to us is that a picture is created when a person understands "taping out" the 20/80 region of STOC. What we do mentally is unroll some electrical tape (black is preferred) and we place it so it fits exactly between the 20 and 80 % on the STOC.

We also use "tape" on a specific kind of channel.

We are not doing woodpecker stuff here.

While you seem to be pecking away at zillions of knot holes you "see"; it could be that you look like a road runner shooting off in all directions and having litttle, if any, reading comprehension.


What a dumb and stupid post you have made.
 
I only trade agaist the trend by fading dramatic openings or at extremes of volatility bands.

Otherwise it pays to go with the trend because the force is with you.:D
 
Quote from Grob109:

Nice post.

In the forum, Index Futures, A thread has begun on carry over for equities investing and trading into futures indexes emphasis is on ES.

The contrast of you words and the first three pages there is that you are dealing with the issues of: time frame (trading fractals), market pace, and the ammount of signals that are present and their frequency.

To make money best, a person does have to be at the right place and the right time.

Being excellent and trading KISS seems to be a remote possibility on that other threads from all the comments.

But is it?

By designing a perfect market to trade, it would naturally be easy to be excellent and KISS would be the mode.

Taping is the perfect trend. It is defined as equal length bars that overlap the same amount going in the same direction.

By rippling up and down fractals you get to see taping at some point as you go to longer and longer fractals. We are lessening sensitivity and really cutting down on the signals impacting us as well.

To "make money", I recommend that we, instead, look at stuff in a standard form as an alternative. That calibrates us and our monitoring (sensing and emotion pairs)to gathr data; calibrates our analysis by making it routine and repeated at a given frequency; gives us a standard set of data to use in concert with our comprehensive array of beliefs (NLP pics); and finally, we need only one action technique.

The single action technique is :"to hit the T as the Bbid/Aask goes to zero.

We have used your scope and bounds of this post; set up taping definition; set fourth four steps to repeat as a routine; and finally just defined action as one single act.

Now we have to do some work. We need to refine.

Start out with taping on the 5 min fractal. Take a bunch of charts a day long each (81 bars each). Look for taping on the 5 min. Then bunch in threes the 5 min bars and see if you find sets of three form 15 periods of taping. That is the given channel on the 5 min chart is traversed within each group of three 5 min bars. If not, then regroup the consecutive groups. Try 4 bars per group. try 5 bars per group.

Sit back and see that a lot of the time you have "taped the market".

Do this. For the tapes that work for periods of time using 5 min bars alone and not bunched, see what happens after the "tape" ends. You will find the following: It moves over and starts again. OR It is a tape if you bunch bars to some extent.

CCC is lateral taping if you do one of the above efforts.

Where we get to is coming to find out that we can see alot of taping for almost all of RTH.

"Bunching" to get "taping" is a method to "kill" an overwelming surplus of signals.

By doing this stuff, you find out that many fewer trades are required just based upon the fact that you "hold" through all tapes.

The "new point 3" has shown up as well. You see that most tapes are trend beginnings like airplane "takeoffs" and that after the initial money velocity, the trend goes into a "grind" of bunched bars that make a tape that continues along at a lower money velocity always within a channel that is defined.


So tapes are channels where each bar "fills" the channel. Channel that form and arenot tapes have traverses, where the traverses are often tapelike.

By using the coarse, medium and fine repeated laps, where all of the above comes under coarse, we have "smoothed" out life considrably. See that medium is a taping exercise as well.

Fine is just used for taking action at precisely the right time.

In SCT, we make money all the time by being on the right side of the trend all the time and finding out we made a lot of money.

I am doing now a days a series of important posts that are long each and redundant. Metalurgically speaking I am "soaking" and annealing. I am also making swords out of traders and Samurai swords were made. we are building strength through the length of our tools by having layer upon layer of pure materials that are consistantly applied over and over in the same way in each layer.

we are going to be able to focus upon where the "bends" are made to fold what we have into a most elegant and cohesive tool.

Tapes are the spans of money making. translation and continuous accumulation of profits occur. Between these we dynamically act to extract.

Coarse has three layers of detail.
Medium has three layers of detail.
Fine has three levels of detail.

Everything is made of sequences. Total sequences loop and repeat. The deepest layers are just nuances that still are pure and unfettered.

When you read the SCT Synopsis, you will be abkle to "see" all the layers, the sequences and how to get to "hitting the T in the same way always as is done at the lower right.

In the very middle you see the difference in a reversal and a resume. Trans is the word that means "taping" in DOM. 2 pair is the simplest ocsillation found in the market; it does not get any better as Jack Nickolson said.

If I take you to continuous (translation) and to the smallest oscillation and those are the only two choices and you "see" that, then you are going to take all the money out of the market that is available all the time it is available exeactly when it is there to take. QED.

What you posted is, if fact, the last question.

This is where people are going to "get" just what "Elite" means.

I have to explain the SCT synopsis in such a way that people get used to it just like driving a car.

The Q's on the table before this one you asked are:

a. What is next?

b. What should I be looking for?

c. What, at a given time, is the most important to look for?

answers:

a. see sequences

b. next step of sequence on coarse, medium and fine.

c. That everything is flawless. If a flaw occurs, then it shows up on coarse, then medium then fine.

NB: Never do only a partial data gathering. (See one signal and act on it.)

NB: Only act by hitting T when the Bbid/Bask goes to zero.
Thanks Jack,..
file saved - Samurai
...sword
 
I snipped out some stuff to best focus on your requests of me. In color, I made a couple of intermnal comments.


Quote from Mecro:



snip....

Some of what you say makes sense and some of it is pure crap. Overall your posts end up as babble

Snip

there is no reason you should try to "talk down" to the rest of the posters but I call bull crap on that.

Snip

How do you get by in life by turning simple concepts into pure babble?

The best traders I know can easily explain what they do and how they trade in a few sentences. I know only one that takes a very scientific approach that is kinda hard to explain and to be honest, I am not impressed.


snip

So cut the crap and stop pretending to be so esoteric. ....... I know enough to know that it's all BS. I read all your threads and there are quite a few times when you were called out and shown to be a liar and full of it. Remember the programmer incident?

I try to post in responce to others. Apparently I have a selective memory vis a vis programming. So I disagree with you.

snip

Actually I really do not care and I am not asking to see your results. I just would like to see some of your trades.

snip

Do this. Post some of your trades, preferably both correct and wrong ones. Then simply explain your entries and exits.

Splice together the last ten prints I have put up on trades by just posting the references in chron order. After that we can go to work.

From this, annotate and post trades that puzzle you. With the annotation put up a five minute chart for the day using my standard beginner set up. I will respond on beginner level, any of the four intermediate levels, or SCT levels. You pick.

Also take the trouble to post your prints so I can check out where you are in the spectrum. Include a chart as well. Annotate the chart where you want to learn about how I would handle that. This will give me a picture of your belief system.

Right now I understand that you have worked with a lot of guys that can explain things in a clear concise crisp way except for the guy who is scientifically oriented. Your annotations will help me to respond in the same tennor and vocabulary that you prefer.

After that you can explain to ET the parts of what I have done that are crap. Nitro has determined everything I do is crap and he has stated that I am a snake type person. I have never responded to anything he has posted anywhere except to "handle" him as required when he makes his case from the viewpoint he has. Usually I ratchet up a notch and popiint out his weak performance in doing what he does.

If you respond to this fine; maybe I will be helpful. as far as I am concerned I am glad to answer anyone's questions no matter where they are coming from. I plan on operating at the level you dictate here.
 
Back
Top