Quote from dbphoenix:
Because you keep asking it.
I bring it up because it's a good question and hasn't been answered, although Michael's response was food for thought. Again though, I'd rather get it from the horse's mouth. So I repeat the question because I'd like an answer. It's a good question. My raising the question again prompts you to repeat your stuff. What a vicious cycle. I'm in the cycle to get my questions answered, and you're in this cycle to.... do what?
If he doesn't respond to you, perhaps it's because of your "gotcha" attitude. As for what you said and what you didn't say, I suggest you review your own posts.
I've reviewed the primary post in question. I see that I was quite clear in stating that these actions suggested the matters I brought forth as questions.
It's interesting that I hypothesize mm's possible reasons for not averaging down, and you criticize me for so doing, yet, here you are hypothesizing what may be mm's reason for not answering me.
Asking pointed questions and examining statements is not part and parcel of a 'gotcha' attitude.
You assert that my questions are "idiotic" because mm's methods, you maintain, do not have to meld with my ideas, with how I would do things, doesn't need to conform to my precepts, or for that matter, what would seem to be my reasonable expectation of what one would do. As you wrote when you chastised me, "Because he doesn't do what you think he ought to do, much less do what you do, he has to be wrong."
Yet, it wasn't all too long ago that you were critical of Jack Hershey on this forum, and why?? Because he didn't contain his whole trading strategy to a few lines on one page, which was according to your frame of reference. Again, applicable is what you wrote, "Because he doesn't do what you think he ought to do, much less do what you do, he has to be wrong."
So, before going forward with any sort of response to me, kindly please first apply the same standards you're citing to me, and make an endeavor to measure up to them yourself.
Hey, BTW, I am enjoying the price and volume thread. But I have no questions about it yet.
Because you keep asking it.
I bring it up because it's a good question and hasn't been answered, although Michael's response was food for thought. Again though, I'd rather get it from the horse's mouth. So I repeat the question because I'd like an answer. It's a good question. My raising the question again prompts you to repeat your stuff. What a vicious cycle. I'm in the cycle to get my questions answered, and you're in this cycle to.... do what?
If he doesn't respond to you, perhaps it's because of your "gotcha" attitude. As for what you said and what you didn't say, I suggest you review your own posts.
I've reviewed the primary post in question. I see that I was quite clear in stating that these actions suggested the matters I brought forth as questions.
It's interesting that I hypothesize mm's possible reasons for not averaging down, and you criticize me for so doing, yet, here you are hypothesizing what may be mm's reason for not answering me.
Asking pointed questions and examining statements is not part and parcel of a 'gotcha' attitude.
You assert that my questions are "idiotic" because mm's methods, you maintain, do not have to meld with my ideas, with how I would do things, doesn't need to conform to my precepts, or for that matter, what would seem to be my reasonable expectation of what one would do. As you wrote when you chastised me, "Because he doesn't do what you think he ought to do, much less do what you do, he has to be wrong."
Yet, it wasn't all too long ago that you were critical of Jack Hershey on this forum, and why?? Because he didn't contain his whole trading strategy to a few lines on one page, which was according to your frame of reference. Again, applicable is what you wrote, "Because he doesn't do what you think he ought to do, much less do what you do, he has to be wrong."
So, before going forward with any sort of response to me, kindly please first apply the same standards you're citing to me, and make an endeavor to measure up to them yourself.
Hey, BTW, I am enjoying the price and volume thread. But I have no questions about it yet.
