Iraq war poll: 61% of Americans want to continue fight

Quote from Doubter:

If we STAY in Iraq will that end the threat of Radical Islamo Fascism and their promise to destroy the Jews and us?

Will Iran stop its' race for the bomb and the missiles to deliver it to our eastern shore?

Will the muslims stop brainwashing their preschoolers to hate us and pledge themselves to our destruction?
]
So you can't answer your own questions, huh? Too bad.
 
Did I just scare Hapaboy away with my simple question? I am still waiting for that stop loss casualty number....
 
Quote from TorontoTrader2:

Israel army has wiped out thousands of palestaniens over the years, yet if they fight back they are 'terrorists'.
You got it all wrong canuck, first palestinians attack Israel, then they get wiped out, then they attack israeli civilians, then they get their well-deserved terrorist status and get wiped out again.

we are taught that palistinians are sub-human.
I don't know about them being sub-human but they were the ones who were dancing in the streets on 9/11.
 
ZZZ is right about this. We were told the reason to go into Iraq was to prevent the development of WMD's that might present an imminent danger to our country. Democracy, freedom and nation-building are nice themes but that wasn't the rationale. There are numerous other countries in the world where we ignore those ideals, eg Saudi Arabia.

The only thing that will restore confidence in the iraq mission is a restatment of why we are there. We simply are not prepared to lose hundreds or thousands more troops, not to mention spend hundreds of billions more, to rebuild Iraq. If we can be shown a rational plan to use our troops to protect our security interests, then maybe. Otherwise, get them out.

And would somebody explain to me why we are expected to rebuild a country with the world's third largest oil reserves?
 
It is such lunacy.

Bush destabilizes a country and a region, then claims that we have to stay because Iraq is unstable...

Then he blames the instability on everyone but himself.

Like a drunk driver plowing into a bus is what it is...

Such stupidity...

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

ZZZ is right about this. We were told the reason to go into Iraq was to prevent the development of WMD's that might present an imminent danger to our country. Democracy, freedom and nation-building are nice themes but that wasn't the rationale. There are numerous other countries in the world where we ignore those ideals, eg Saudi Arabia.

The only thing that will restore confidence in the iraq mission is a restatment of why we are there. We simply are not prepared to lose hundreds or thousands more troops, not to mention spend hundreds of billions more, to rebuild Iraq. If we can be shown a rational plan to use our troops to protect our security interests, then maybe. Otherwise, get them out.

And would somebody explain to me why we are expected to rebuild a country with the world's third largest oil reserves?
 
Quote from TorontoTrader2:

And we brainwash our kids to be racist too.

What red blooded american solder wouldn;t like to waste a few r_g heads as they are taught. And then laugh about it later. Pure evil.


An article in the Wall st journal last week said that Japenese were "barbaric" to their POWs in WW2 by beheading them.

Is that as barbaric as killing scores of innocent civillians in non-military target towns with the most barbaric WMD known to mankind - aton bomb? Imagine all the flesh dripping off as their lay there screaming, all the cancer afterwards, but we don't care about that. ALL were innocent civillians just living as we do. 100,000s of tousands, all nececities of life wiped out in a terror act.

Why oh why do they hate us, I can't possibly think of why


Israel army has wiped out thousands of palestaniens over the years, yet if they fight back they are 'terrorists'. Racism at work again, we are taught that palistinians are sub-human.


the japanese are some of the most "racist" people there are....

do you spend alot of time in the fetal position?

grow a spine you putz.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

And would somebody explain to me why we are expected to rebuild a country with the world's third largest oil reserves?
The pottery barn rule? Not that I think we should rebuild Iraq but generally speaking that would be a reasonable explanation. We did break it, didn't we?
 
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon announced Friday that 57,000 U.S. troops, including five combat brigades, have been told to deploy to Iraq early next year — a move that will maintain current force levels there.

Bush won't bend. I don't know if the country can stand two more years of this nonsense. Dems need to step up and start playing some real hardball and it needs to start happening today.
 
Quote from Pekelo:

No, simple question. I assume you wouldn't sacrifice 1 million Americans, but you are OK with 3000, so the stop loss number should be somewhere in between. So here is an exercise for you:

Start going up and keep asking yourself : Is 10K dead Americans worthy of Iraqi freedom? If you said yes, keep going up. After a while you will reach a number when you say: Ah, that is just too many. Please post that number. Just one simple number, please...

By the way, the US lost 50K soldiers in Vietnam for the Vietnamese freedom, that didn't come true. And at the very end Vietnam just like China is getting to be capitalist...


By the way another question: How many US soldier should die for the North Korean freedom? Well, for a burger, let's throw in the Tibetian freedom too, and for a Chrirtmas present, the Chinese freedom too....

P.S.: We are on a trading message board, and before each trade you should know what is the maximum pain that you can bear.
Can't give you a number, as much as you want one. The problem with your analogy to a trading stop-loss is that the repercussions of failure in Iraq go far beyond the lives and expense incurred thus far.

Since you think it is a simple exercise, perhaps you can simply answer this: How many American military lives are worth preventing a nuclear weapon from being detonated in an American city?

And again, how many American lives is it worth to make Iraq a stable democracy if doing so may transform the region, as happened to Eastern Europe?
 
Quote from hapaboy:

And again, how many American lives is it worth to make Iraq a stable democracy if doing so may transform the region, as happened to Eastern Europe?
Hapa, Iraq will never be a stable democracy, the Middle East is not Eastern Europe, Islam is not Christianity or atheism for that matter. When allowed to elect their leaders they elect Hamas, Hezbollah, Muqtada Al Sadr, Ahmadinejad...After WWII there was no insurgency in Western Europe or Japan, americans were actually welcomed as liberators. That's not exactly the case in Iraq, is it? I am sure you mean well but please pay a little attention to the reality.
 
Back
Top