Iran Strike By US Scheduled For 6th April 2007

Quote from indahook:

In the case of full scale warfare with a longtime enemy, potential nuclear threat and harborers of terrorists I would say the level of initial activity would pulverize all "Class A" targets and cripple infrastructure. The USA would not bother with any targets outside of populated areas. No sending troops into the mountains this time. Factories, farms, water supply, Mosques, airports and the like would be rubble in 48 hours. The Geneva convention would not exist during a full scale conflict with Iran. The Presidents goal would be to attack until they beg for mercy. And then keep on attacking some more. Once again..not how I would want to see it go down. Fact. This has been brewing for decades.

Ok, i`m done with this thread...i`m making myself sick to my stomach.


I don't see it as being that straightforward, nuclear weapons won't be used unless there is a direct nuclear threat to the US. The neighbors of Iran will be mightily displeased with the radiation they suddenly have to deal with, the Saudi's, Kuwait, Israel, etc, etc. I just don't see that happening, the US would then become isolated and globally hated. The Russians and Chinese would be the threats we'd suddenly find ourselves confronted with.

The stakes are way too high to bring out nukes to put Iran down, it would be like sentencing someone to death for theft. Pure overkill and completely unacceptable to the civilized world.
 
Quote from TM1:

I don't see it as being that straightforward, nuclear weapons


All of what I said could be done with conventional weapons. I didnt mean nuclear.
 
Quote from indahook:

All of what I said could be done with conventional weapons. I didn't mean nuclear.

Ok, well that makes your statement have a higher probability of occurring at some point, although our technological advances in warfare do allow us to spare a lot of life versus even a few years ago.
 
Quote from TorontoTrader2:

So the Genva convention is dead?

B..b..but I thought we were spreading democracy, liberty, that we are not barbarians, that we want to liberate arabs?

So well put.
"Horns of a dilemma" I believe this situation is called.
 
Quote from TorontoTrader2:

So the Genva convention is dead?

B..b..but I thought we were spreading democracy, liberty, that we are not barbarians, that we want to liberate arabs?

Well at least Canada has liberated homo's... and legal prostitution
for teenagers. And marijuana too?

Why do you keep posting as if you were American? You are not.
 
two pieces of shit we can do without; ahmadickhead & Chavez. Good thing I'm not the boss. Where's Winston Churchill when you need him.
 
Brits in the Gulf and a Doctored British Map? - UPDATED

Barry Lando / Craig Murray

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is now challenging the legitimacy of the map just published by the British government in the current dispute with Iran over those 15 captured British sailors and marines.

"Fake Maritime Boundaries

I have been unpopular before, but the level of threats since I started blogging on the captured marines has got a bit scary.

It is therefore with some trepidation that I feel obliged to point this out.

"The British Government has published a map showing the coordinates of the incident, well within an Iran/Iraq maritime border. The mainstream media and even the blogosphere has bought this hook, line and sinker.

"But there are two colossal problems.

"A) The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government map does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British Government. Only Iraq and Iran can agree their bilateral boundary, and they never have done this in the Gulf, only inside the Shatt because there it is the land border too. This published boundary is a fake with no legal force.

"B) Accepting the British coordinates for the position of both HMS Cornwall and the incident, both were closer to Iranian land than Iraqi land. Go on, print out the map and measure it. Which underlines the point that the British produced border is not a reliable one.

"None of which changes the fact that the Iranians, having made their point, should have handed back the captives immediately. I pray they do so before this thing spirals out of control. But by producing a fake map of the Iran/Iraq boundary, notably unfavourable to Iran, we can only harden the Iranian position."

When I spoke with the former Ambassador he told me how dumbfounded he is by the way in which the mainstream media continues to treat this dispute.

The BBC for instance has already interviewed a supposed expert regarding the map, who vouched for its authenticity. But the point is, as Craig Murray, points out, how can such a map exist if the subject of boundaries has never been settled between Iraq and Iran? Turns out the expert had been referred to the BBC by the British Ministry of Defense--who also turned out the plan.

Sounds like the rerun of a bad movie we've already seen.


Barry Lando is the author of WEB OF DECEIT: The History of Western Complicity in Iraq, From Churchill to Kennedy to George W. Bush, just published by Other Press. Born in Canada and educated at Harvard and Columbia, Lando was a correspondent for Time-Life before becoming a producer for 60 Minutes, where he worked for twenty five years. He has won several top journalism awards, including two Emmys, a Dupont and a George Polk. Aside from producing more than a hundred reports for 60 Minutes, he also reported and produced an hour long documentary in 2004 for France’s Canal+ on Saddam Hussein, a documentary which was then rebroadcast in several countries around the globe. He has written extensively for such publications as The Atlantic, The Los Angeles Times, The Christian Science Monitor, The International Herald Tribune, Le Monde, and Salon. He currently lives in Paris.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1054
 
Quote from Publisher:

Brits in the Gulf and a Doctored British Map? - UPDATED

Barry Lando / Craig Murray

Former British Ambassador Craig Murray is now challenging the legitimacy of the map just published by the British government in the current dispute with Iran over those 15 captured British sailors and marines.


Yeah ask Barry Lando how he'd feel if someone in his family was taken. Then we'd have to rescue them or die trying. Don't F**kin get me started!!:mad:
 
Back
Top